Seems to have a bug and is generally not strong

#1
by Mike0365 - opened

Hi folks,

I tested "mradermacher/qwen3.8-flash-coder-85gb-bf16-GGUF" Q8_0 (45.4GB) today.

It seems to have a bug:
With terse instructions like "answer only with..." (reproduced in both English and German), the model dumps its entire response into the reasoning_content channel and leaves content empty. Any standard harness reading only content sees a blank answer. Needed to patch my benchmark scripts with a fallback to reasoning_content to measure the model's actual capability rather than this problem.

Test Results:
Light coding suite: 17/30 - where other models based on qwen3.6 had 30/30
Hard coding suite: 4/32 - worse than EVERY other model I have tested in 2026
Trap prompts : 0/2 -
Currency: wrong conversion chain and the arithmetic itself was wrong.
Elevator riddle: completely derailed β€” treated a classic lateral-thinking puzzle as a binary-search algorithm problem

The thin post-pruning recalibration (308 steps) appears to have damaged both output-channel discipline and general reasoning quality.
The model's self-reported benchmark claims (67% Pass@1) don't hold up.

Sorry for no better feedback. Would have loved to have a strong qwen3.8 model
Regards, Mike

Would have loved to have a strong qwen3.8 model

well, try another model then =)

and I cant guarrantee the quality, since you know, we are not the author, we are quanting =)

I asked qwen3.8-flash-coder-85gb-i1 to do the code review of some of my scripts using Hermes Agent. Unfortunately, it falls in endless loop while thinking. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but now I'm not happy with it.

Not sure guys, it might simply be llamacpp not being sure how to handle this model and routing through nullified experts. Im not sure, maybe that's the reason, since the architecture was modified (removed like 2/3 of experts), so quite interesting it was even been able to quant. Could anyone try to check the temperature and other settings? Maybe setup needs to be different on inference stage

It may need some finetuning first.

I asked qwen3.8-flash-coder-85gb-i1 to do the code review of some of my scripts using Hermes Agent. Unfortunately, it falls in endless loop while thinking. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but now I'm not happy with it.

Try another coding agent like Pi or whatever.
Then pass the results to Claude or ChatGPT. Let the LLM figure whats wrong. Then learn from it.

Sign up or log in to comment