scenario stringlengths 185 268 | language stringclasses 1
value | risk_type stringclasses 12
values | severity stringclasses 4
values | reasoning stringclasses 96
values | recommended_action stringclasses 3
values | legal_context stringclasses 12
values | confidence float64 0.87 0.99 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A 25-year-old woman from Hyderabad reported an incident of coercive control. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | coercive control | high | This case constitutes coercive control based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.88 |
A 44-year-old woman from Patna reported an incident of coercive control. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | coercive control | medium | Analysis confirms coercive control due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.87 |
In Mumbai, a 51-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding coercive control. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | coercive control | medium | Analysis confirms coercive control due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.97 |
A 35-year-old professional in Pune experienced coercive control. The situation was assessed as medium severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | coercive control | medium | Analysis confirms coercive control due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.97 |
A 35-year-old professional in Kolkata experienced domestic violence. The situation was assessed as medium severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | domestic violence | medium | Analysis confirms domestic violence due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 Sections 3 and 18 | 0.98 |
A 31-year-old woman from Pune reported an incident of deepfake abuse. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | deepfake abuse | high | This case constitutes deepfake abuse based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.91 |
A 31-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced online harassment. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | online harassment | low | Analysis confirms online harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.92 |
A 44-year-old professional in Hyderabad experienced cyberstalking. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | cyberstalking | high | Analysis confirms cyberstalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.97 |
In Coimbatore, a 45-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding cyberstalking. The harm caused was classified as critical. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | cyberstalking | critical | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.89 |
In Bhopal, a 18-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding financial exploitation. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | financial exploitation | low | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.9 |
In Delhi, a 22-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding deepfake abuse. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | deepfake abuse | low | Analysis confirms deepfake abuse due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.87 |
In Bhopal, a 23-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding workplace harassment. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | workplace harassment | medium | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.98 |
A 29-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced coercive control. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | coercive control | high | This case constitutes coercive control based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.94 |
In Patna, a 23-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding revenge content (NCII). The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | revenge content (NCII) | medium | Analysis confirms revenge content (NCII) due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.96 |
A 33-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced coercive control. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | coercive control | low | This case constitutes coercive control based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.93 |
A 35-year-old professional in Patna experienced trafficking indicators. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | trafficking indicators | critical | This case constitutes trafficking indicators based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.95 |
In Surat, a 40-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding trafficking indicators. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | trafficking indicators | low | Analysis confirms trafficking indicators due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.9 |
In Delhi, a 37-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding trafficking indicators. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | trafficking indicators | low | This case constitutes trafficking indicators based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.89 |
A 47-year-old woman from Visakhapatnam reported an incident of blackmail / extortion. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing low-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | blackmail / extortion | low | Analysis confirms blackmail / extortion due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 308(4) (extortion), IT Act Section 66C | 0.97 |
A 32-year-old professional in Jaipur experienced coercive control. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | coercive control | critical | This case constitutes coercive control based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.96 |
In Patna, a 18-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding deepfake abuse. The harm caused was classified as critical. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | deepfake abuse | critical | Analysis confirms deepfake abuse due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.95 |
A 18-year-old professional in Surat experienced public safety / stalking. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | public safety / stalking | low | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.9 |
A 44-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced revenge content (NCII). The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | revenge content (NCII) | critical | This case constitutes revenge content (NCII) based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.94 |
A 25-year-old woman from Bangalore reported an incident of financial exploitation. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | financial exploitation | medium | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.92 |
A 32-year-old professional in Coimbatore experienced online harassment. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | online harassment | critical | Analysis confirms online harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.91 |
In Chennai, a 26-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding financial exploitation. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | financial exploitation | low | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.98 |
A 25-year-old professional in Chennai experienced domestic violence. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | domestic violence | high | This case constitutes domestic violence based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 Sections 3 and 18 | 0.88 |
A 51-year-old woman from Lucknow reported an incident of trafficking indicators. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | trafficking indicators | medium | This case constitutes trafficking indicators based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.98 |
A 34-year-old woman from Bangalore reported an incident of workplace harassment. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | workplace harassment | medium | This case constitutes workplace harassment based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.91 |
A 44-year-old woman from Visakhapatnam reported an incident of blackmail / extortion. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing critical-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | blackmail / extortion | critical | This case constitutes blackmail / extortion based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 308(4) (extortion), IT Act Section 66C | 0.89 |
In Chennai, a 26-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding financial exploitation. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | financial exploitation | medium | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.95 |
A 22-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced deepfake abuse. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | deepfake abuse | critical | Analysis confirms deepfake abuse due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.88 |
In Kolkata, a 33-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding public safety / stalking. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | public safety / stalking | low | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.98 |
A 18-year-old woman from Hyderabad reported an incident of workplace harassment. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing low-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | workplace harassment | low | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.89 |
In Pune, a 34-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding emotional manipulation. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | emotional manipulation | medium | This case constitutes emotional manipulation based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.97 |
A 37-year-old professional in Lucknow experienced emotional manipulation. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | emotional manipulation | high | This case constitutes emotional manipulation based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.9 |
A 35-year-old professional in Lucknow experienced cyberstalking. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | cyberstalking | critical | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.89 |
A 39-year-old woman from Surat reported an incident of public safety / stalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | public safety / stalking | medium | This case constitutes public safety / stalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.94 |
A 33-year-old woman from Patna reported an incident of coercive control. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | coercive control | medium | Analysis confirms coercive control due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.98 |
A 52-year-old woman from Jaipur reported an incident of financial exploitation. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing critical-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | financial exploitation | critical | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.95 |
A 36-year-old professional in Coimbatore experienced deepfake abuse. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | deepfake abuse | low | Analysis confirms deepfake abuse due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.88 |
In Patna, a 41-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding financial exploitation. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | financial exploitation | medium | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.89 |
A 26-year-old professional in Bangalore experienced workplace harassment. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | workplace harassment | critical | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.93 |
A 41-year-old woman from Surat reported an incident of trafficking indicators. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing low-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | trafficking indicators | low | Analysis confirms trafficking indicators due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.9 |
In Patna, a 46-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding revenge content (NCII). The harm caused was classified as high. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | revenge content (NCII) | high | This case constitutes revenge content (NCII) based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.93 |
A 18-year-old professional in Pune experienced cyberstalking. The situation was assessed as medium severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | cyberstalking | medium | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.89 |
In Jaipur, a 39-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding public safety / stalking. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | public safety / stalking | low | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.97 |
A 51-year-old professional in Patna experienced deepfake abuse. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | deepfake abuse | critical | This case constitutes deepfake abuse based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.9 |
A 19-year-old professional in Kolkata experienced emotional manipulation. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | emotional manipulation | low | Analysis confirms emotional manipulation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.96 |
A 51-year-old woman from Bhopal reported an incident of revenge content (NCII). The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | revenge content (NCII) | high | Analysis confirms revenge content (NCII) due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.97 |
In Pune, a 27-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding cyberstalking. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | cyberstalking | low | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.9 |
In Coimbatore, a 39-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding deepfake abuse. The harm caused was classified as critical. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | deepfake abuse | critical | Analysis confirms deepfake abuse due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.9 |
In Coimbatore, a 34-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding domestic violence. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | domestic violence | medium | This case constitutes domestic violence based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 Sections 3 and 18 | 0.97 |
A 20-year-old woman from Kolkata reported an incident of emotional manipulation. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | emotional manipulation | medium | Analysis confirms emotional manipulation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.94 |
A 43-year-old professional in Jaipur experienced public safety / stalking. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | public safety / stalking | high | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.93 |
In Chennai, a 29-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding financial exploitation. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | financial exploitation | medium | This case constitutes financial exploitation based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.89 |
A 30-year-old woman from Ahmedabad reported an incident of cyberstalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing critical-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | cyberstalking | critical | Analysis confirms cyberstalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.98 |
A 33-year-old professional in Bangalore experienced financial exploitation. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | financial exploitation | low | This case constitutes financial exploitation based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.97 |
A 38-year-old professional in Bangalore experienced online harassment. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | online harassment | high | This case constitutes online harassment based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.97 |
A 52-year-old woman from Jaipur reported an incident of online harassment. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing critical-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | online harassment | critical | Analysis confirms online harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.92 |
A 49-year-old professional in Patna experienced trafficking indicators. The situation was assessed as medium severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | trafficking indicators | medium | This case constitutes trafficking indicators based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.94 |
In Chennai, a 23-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding online harassment. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | online harassment | medium | This case constitutes online harassment based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.92 |
A 20-year-old professional in Pune experienced cyberstalking. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | cyberstalking | low | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.94 |
A 41-year-old professional in Delhi experienced coercive control. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | coercive control | low | Analysis confirms coercive control due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.88 |
A 18-year-old professional in Mumbai experienced financial exploitation. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | financial exploitation | high | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.88 |
In Mumbai, a 52-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding emotional manipulation. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | emotional manipulation | low | This case constitutes emotional manipulation based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.96 |
A 36-year-old woman from Chennai reported an incident of public safety / stalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | public safety / stalking | medium | This case constitutes public safety / stalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.93 |
In Kolkata, a 28-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding revenge content (NCII). The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | revenge content (NCII) | medium | This case constitutes revenge content (NCII) based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.9 |
A 44-year-old woman from Bhopal reported an incident of revenge content (NCII). The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing low-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | revenge content (NCII) | low | This case constitutes revenge content (NCII) based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.96 |
A 34-year-old professional in Lucknow experienced workplace harassment. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | workplace harassment | low | This case constitutes workplace harassment based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.93 |
A 20-year-old professional in Hyderabad experienced financial exploitation. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | financial exploitation | high | Analysis confirms financial exploitation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 316 (cheating), IPC Section 498A as applicable | 0.93 |
In Jaipur, a 43-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding workplace harassment. The harm caused was classified as high. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | workplace harassment | high | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.96 |
In Chennai, a 25-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding emotional manipulation. The harm caused was classified as high. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | emotional manipulation | high | Analysis confirms emotional manipulation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.96 |
A 37-year-old woman from Lucknow reported an incident of cyberstalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | cyberstalking | medium | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.94 |
A 27-year-old professional in Lucknow experienced public safety / stalking. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | public safety / stalking | high | This case constitutes public safety / stalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.87 |
In Mumbai, a 30-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding public safety / stalking. The harm caused was classified as critical. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | public safety / stalking | critical | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.95 |
A 51-year-old professional in Kolkata experienced revenge content (NCII). The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | revenge content (NCII) | critical | Analysis confirms revenge content (NCII) due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.99 |
A 35-year-old woman from Lucknow reported an incident of public safety / stalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | public safety / stalking | high | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.93 |
A 24-year-old professional in Patna experienced workplace harassment. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | workplace harassment | high | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.96 |
A 47-year-old professional in Chennai experienced online harassment. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | online harassment | high | This case constitutes online harassment based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.88 |
A 35-year-old professional in Surat experienced public safety / stalking. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | public safety / stalking | critical | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.95 |
A 27-year-old woman from Surat reported an incident of trafficking indicators. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | trafficking indicators | high | Analysis confirms trafficking indicators due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.89 |
A 43-year-old professional in Coimbatore experienced workplace harassment. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | workplace harassment | high | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.97 |
A 29-year-old woman from Surat reported an incident of blackmail / extortion. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing critical-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | blackmail / extortion | critical | Analysis confirms blackmail / extortion due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 308(4) (extortion), IT Act Section 66C | 0.92 |
A 47-year-old professional in Kolkata experienced workplace harassment. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | workplace harassment | critical | Analysis confirms workplace harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | POSH Act 2013 Sections 2(n) and 11, BNS Section 74 | 0.92 |
A 18-year-old woman from Chennai reported an incident of cyberstalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | cyberstalking | high | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.96 |
A 47-year-old professional in Surat experienced online harassment. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | online harassment | critical | Analysis confirms online harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.92 |
A 50-year-old woman from Patna reported an incident of coercive control. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing medium-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | coercive control | medium | Analysis confirms coercive control due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3 | 0.97 |
In Delhi, a 26-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding cyberstalking. The harm caused was classified as low. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | cyberstalking | low | Analysis confirms cyberstalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.95 |
A 45-year-old woman from Coimbatore reported an incident of trafficking indicators. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing low-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | trafficking indicators | low | Analysis confirms trafficking indicators due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.93 |
A 31-year-old professional in Lucknow experienced deepfake abuse. The situation was assessed as medium severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | deepfake abuse | medium | This case constitutes deepfake abuse based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The medium severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73 (outraging modesty), DPDPA 2023 | 0.99 |
A 34-year-old woman from Coimbatore reported an incident of revenge content (NCII). The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing low-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | revenge content (NCII) | low | Analysis confirms revenge content (NCII) due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The low classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | IT Act Section 67A, BNS Section 73, NCPCR guidelines | 0.93 |
A 45-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced domestic violence. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | domestic violence | critical | This case constitutes domestic violence based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The critical severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 Sections 3 and 18 | 0.95 |
A 47-year-old woman from Jaipur reported an incident of cyberstalking. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | cyberstalking | high | Analysis confirms cyberstalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.98 |
A 42-year-old professional in Ahmedabad experienced emotional manipulation. The situation was assessed as critical severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | emotional manipulation | critical | Analysis confirms emotional manipulation due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator. | PWDVA Section 3(c) (emotional abuse), BNS Section 85 | 0.91 |
A 45-year-old professional in Lucknow experienced trafficking indicators. The situation was assessed as low severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | trafficking indicators | low | This case constitutes trafficking indicators based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The low severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | ITPA Section 5, BNS Sections 143-144 (trafficking in persons) | 0.99 |
A 39-year-old professional in Mumbai experienced public safety / stalking. The situation was assessed as high severity. She had documented evidence and approached the local cyber cell for assistance. | English | public safety / stalking | high | Analysis confirms public safety / stalking due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The high classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 78 (stalking), BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation) | 0.98 |
A 40-year-old woman from Kolkata reported an incident of online harassment. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing critical-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life. | English | online harassment | critical | Analysis confirms online harassment due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The critical classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 351 (criminal intimidation), IT Act Section 67 (obscene content) | 0.9 |
In Jaipur, a 50-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding blackmail / extortion. The harm caused was classified as medium. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | blackmail / extortion | medium | Analysis confirms blackmail / extortion due to the nature, frequency, and intent of the perpetrator's actions. The medium classification reflects both the psychological harm and the potential for escalation. Immediate legal and support intervention is warranted. | Preserve all digital evidence (screenshots, call logs). Report immediately to the cyber cell or dial 1930 (National Cyber Helpline). Seek support from iCall or iDare. | BNS Section 308(4) (extortion), IT Act Section 66C | 0.99 |
In Bangalore, a 23-year-old woman filed a complaint regarding cyberstalking. The harm caused was classified as high. She was advised on legal remedies and support organizations available in her area. | English | cyberstalking | high | This case constitutes cyberstalking based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law. | File an FIR at the nearest police station or via the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). Contact the State Women's Commission for additional support. | BNS Section 78 (Stalking), IT Act Section 66E (privacy violation) | 0.96 |
NariRaksha-100K
A structured dataset of Indian women's safety scenarios paired with risk classification, step-by-step reasoning, recommended actions, and applicable legal context (BNS / IT Act / PWDVA), built to support fine-tuning of safety-assessment language models such as NariRaksha-3B.
Dataset Summary
Each row describes a safety scenario and a corresponding structured assessment: risk category, severity, reasoning, a recommended action for the victim, and the relevant Indian legal provisions. The dataset is intended as training/fine-tuning data for models that triage or explain safety situations — not as a verified legal, medical, or emergency-response reference (see Limitations below).
Dataset Structure
Data Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
scenario |
string |
Narrative description of the safety scenario |
language |
string |
Language of the scenario text |
risk_type |
string |
Risk category (e.g. coercive control, cyberstalking) |
severity |
string |
low / medium / high / critical |
reasoning |
string |
Step-by-step rationale for the classification |
recommended_action |
string |
Suggested action for the victim, often including a helpline |
legal_context |
string |
Applicable BNS / IT Act / PWDVA sections |
confidence |
float64 |
Model/annotator-assigned confidence score (0–1) |
Data Splits
A single split of approximately 100,000 rows. No predefined
train/validation/test split is provided — downstream users should partition
according to their own evaluation protocol (e.g. stratified by risk_type
and severity to preserve class balance).
Example Row
{
"scenario": "A 25-year-old woman from Hyderabad reported an incident of coercive control. The perpetrator had been targeting her for several weeks, causing high-level distress. She sought help after the situation escalated and began affecting her professional life.",
"language": "English",
"risk_type": "coercive control",
"severity": "high",
"reasoning": "This case constitutes coercive control based on the sustained, unwanted conduct directed at the victim. The high severity is consistent with the documented impact on her daily functioning and emotional well-being. The pattern of behaviour meets the legal threshold under Indian law.",
"recommended_action": "Contact Shakti Shalini (011-24373736) or the National Commission for Women (7217735372). Ensure personal safety and avoid engaging with the perpetrator.",
"legal_context": "BNS Section 85 (cruelty by husband/relatives), PWDVA Section 3",
"confidence": 0.88
}
Dataset Creation
Source Data
The dataset is a mix of synthetic, LLM-generated scenarios and real-derived templates — some scenarios are modeled on patterns from anonymized, publicly reported case types and then rewritten/generalized; others are fully synthetic. No raw real-world case records, personal data, or identifying information are included.
Generation Process
reasoning and recommended_action fields were generated using a
template-conditioned approach keyed largely on risk_type and severity
combinations, rather than being independently authored per scenario. As a
result, a substantial share of rows share near-identical boilerplate text in
these fields (see Dataset Composition Notes
below) — this is a property of the generation pipeline, not a data quality
defect, but it should inform how you sample, deduplicate, or weight the data
during training.
Dataset Composition Notes
Value distributions are imbalanced across categorical fields. For example:
risk_type: no single category dominates, but coverage across categories is uneven (e.g.coercive control≈ 7.9% of rows).severity:high≈ 24.5% of rows, with the remaining mass spread acrosslow/medium/critical.reasoning: the single most common value covers ≈ 31% of all rows.recommended_action: the single most common value covers ≈ 33.9% of all rows.
This means reasoning and recommended_action are far less diverse
than scenario text. Users training generative models on this data should
be aware that naive fine-tuning may cause a model to overfit to a small set
of stock phrases for these fields.
Limitations and Known Issues
- Legal and helpline content is only partially verified. Citations to BNS sections, IT Act provisions, PWDVA sections, and helpline numbers are a mix of manually verified and LLM-generated, unverified entries. Some legal references or contact numbers in this dataset may be inaccurate, outdated, or incorrectly matched to the scenario. Do not treat any single row as a verified legal or emergency-response source.
- Synthetic content. A portion of scenarios are fully synthetic and do not describe real events. They are illustrative, not statistically representative of actual incident rates or demographics.
- Templated reasoning/actions. As noted above,
reasoningandrecommended_actionexhibit low lexical diversity relative toscenario. - Not for deployment as-is. Models trained on this data for real-world safety triage, legal advice, or emergency response should undergo independent legal review and human-in-the-loop validation before any operational use. This dataset is a research/fine-tuning resource, not a certified safety or legal database.
Considerations for Using the Data
This dataset deals with sensitive subject matter (gender-based violence, stalking, coercive control, and related harms). Users should:
- Avoid presenting model outputs trained on this data as authoritative legal or medical advice.
- Independently verify any helpline number or legal citation before surfacing it to an end user.
- Be mindful of language and cultural context when adapting scenarios beyond the Indian legal system (BNS / IT Act / PWDVA are India-specific).
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite the associated casebook chapter:
@incollection{nariraksha2026,
title = {NariRaksha: Gender-Responsive AI for Women's Safety},
author = {Vikhram S and Jeffin Gracewell J},
booktitle = {India AI Impact Summit 2026 Casebook on AI and Gender Empowerment},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India and UN Women}
}
License
Apache 2.0. See the LICENSE file for details.
- Downloads last month
- 26