Datasets:
case_id stringlengths 16 16 | chunk_id stringlengths 20 20 | chunk_index int64 0 193 | total_chunks int64 1 194 | text stringlengths 356 4.26k | text_original stringlengths 300 4.11k | char_start int64 0 620k | char_end int64 300 624k | page_start int64 1 390 | page_end int64 1 390 | section_type stringclasses 16
values | section_priority int64 30 100 | box_aware bool 1
class | court stringclasses 2
values | court_code stringclasses 1
value | court_type stringclasses 1
value | bench stringclasses 2
values | bench_strength int64 0 51 | judges listlengths 0 51 | title stringlengths 8 220 | description stringlengths 99 587 ⌀ | petitioner stringlengths 3 200 ⌀ | respondent stringlengths 1 200 ⌀ | disposition stringclasses 29
values | case_number stringlengths 0 29 | citation stringclasses 1
value | decision_date stringlengths 10 19 ⌀ | date_of_registration stringdate 1964-12-31 00:00:00 2025-10-10 00:00:00 ⌀ | year int64 1.99k 2.03k | source_url stringclasses 1
value | language_code stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPHC020261212022 | UPHC020261212022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /3001/2022 of MOHAMMAD UBAID Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. AND CHAIRMAN DEPTT. OF TELECOMMUNICATIO... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3001 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mohammad UbaidRespondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. And Chairman Deptt. Of Telecommunication And 3 Ot... | Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3001 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mohammad UbaidRespondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. And Chairman Deptt. Of Telecommunication And 3 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Prem ShankerCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Krishna Chandra Srivastava
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.
Heard learned Counsel for... | 0 | 1,112 | 1 | 1 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /3001/2022 of MOHAMMAD UBAID Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. AND CHAIRMAN DEPTT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND 3 OTHERS | Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3001 of 2022 Petitioner :- Mohammad Ubaid Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. And Chairman Deptt. Of Telecommunication And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Shanker Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Krishna Chandra Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Heard learned | /3001/2022 of MOHAMMAD UBAID | UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. AND CHAIRMAN DEPTT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND 3 OTHERS | DISPOSED | 2022-05-20 00:00:00 | 18-05-2022 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020639252022 | UPHC020639252022_000 | 0 | 3 | Case: /7710/2022 of GANGA RAM AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7710 of 2022
Applicant :- Ganga Ram And OthersOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Anoth... | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7710 of 2022
Applicant :- Ganga Ram And OthersOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And AnotherCounsel for Applicant :- Malti MishraCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## '-Honble Ajai Kumar SrivastavaI,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applican... | 0 | 4,093 | 2 | 3 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /7710/2022 of GANGA RAM AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7710 of 2022 Applicant :- Ganga Ram And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Malti Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. Heard learned counsel for | In State of Haryana | Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v.Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the Hon'ble SupremeCourt in paragraph no.102 has held as under | DISPOSED | 1 of 2021 | 2022-10-21 00:00:00 | 20-10-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020639252022 | UPHC020639252022_001 | 1 | 3 | Case: /7710/2022 of GANGA RAM AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
(1) Where the allegations made in the first information report orthe complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and
accepted in their entirety do ... | (1) Where the allegations made in the first information report orthe complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and
accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute anyoffence or make out a case against the accused.
(2) Where the allegations in the first information report and othermateria... | 3,530 | 7,329 | 2 | 4 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /7710/2022 of GANGA RAM AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7710 of 2022 Applicant :- Ganga Ram And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Malti Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. Heard learned counsel for | In State of Haryana | Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v.Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the Hon'ble SupremeCourt in paragraph no.102 has held as under | DISPOSED | 1 of 2021 | 2022-10-21 00:00:00 | 20-10-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020639252022 | UPHC020639252022_002 | 2 | 3 | Case: /7710/2022 of GANGA RAM AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
18. Situated thus, to non-suit the complainant, at the stage ofthe summoning order, when the factual controversy is yet to becanvassed and considered by t... | 18. Situated thus, to non-suit the complainant, at the stage ofthe summoning order, when the factual controversy is yet to becanvassed and considered by the trial court will not in ouropinion be judicious. Based upon a prima facie impression, anelement of criminality cannot entirely be ruled out here subjectt... | 6,850 | 10,911 | 4 | 6 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /7710/2022 of GANGA RAM AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7710 of 2022 Applicant :- Ganga Ram And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Malti Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. Heard learned counsel for | In State of Haryana | Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v.Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the Hon'ble SupremeCourt in paragraph no.102 has held as under | DISPOSED | 1 of 2021 | 2022-10-21 00:00:00 | 20-10-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020428932021 | UPHC020428932021_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: CRLP/30318/2021 of BADI @ MANJU Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME LUCKNOW and ORS (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: CONCLUSION
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 30318 of 2021
Petitioner :- Badi @ Manju
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home Lucknow
And OrsCounsel for Petitioner :-... | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 30318 of 2021
Petitioner :- Badi @ Manju
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home Lucknow
And OrsCounsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar MishraCounsel for Respondent :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.
Under challenge in this petiti... | 0 | 935 | 1 | 1 | conclusion | 95 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | CRLP/30318/2021 of BADI @ MANJU Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME LUCKNOW and ORS | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 30318 of 2021 Petitioner :- Badi @ Manju Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home Lucknow And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J. Under challenge in | CRLP/30318/2021 of BADI @ MANJU | STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME LUCKNOW and ORS | DISMISSED | 0566 of 2021 | 2022-10-14 00:00:00 | 20-12-2021 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020452122022 | UPHC020452122022_000 | 0 | 2 | Case: /8914/2022 of GANESH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8914 of 2022
Applicant :- Ganesh
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.Counsel for Applicant :- Adil Aziz KhanCounsel for Opposit... | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8914 of 2022
Applicant :- Ganesh
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.Counsel for Applicant :- Adil Aziz KhanCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri Adil Aziz Khan, learned counsel for the applicant SriDiw... | 0 | 4,043 | 2 | 2 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"issuing the release"
] | /8914/2022 of GANESH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8914 of 2022 Applicant :- Ganesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Adil Aziz Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. Heard Sri Adil Aziz Khan, learned counsel for the | Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that if otherwisethe case of bail is made out then the applicant cannot be keptlanguishing in jail on account of his criminal antecedents. InPawan Kumar Pa | State of U.P. reported in [2007 (1)JIC 680 (Allahabad)], it has been opined by this very Courtthat if the accused is otherwise entitled to bail, the same should | Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted | 295 of 2022 | 2022-08-08 00:00:00 | 05-08-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020452122022 | UPHC020452122022_001 | 1 | 2 | Case: /8914/2022 of GANESH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trialand in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear beforeth... | (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trialand in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear beforethe Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the TrialCourt shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance... | 3,251 | 4,372 | 2 | 2 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"issuing the release"
] | /8914/2022 of GANESH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8914 of 2022 Applicant :- Ganesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Adil Aziz Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. Heard Sri Adil Aziz Khan, learned counsel for the | Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that if otherwisethe case of bail is made out then the applicant cannot be keptlanguishing in jail on account of his criminal antecedents. InPawan Kumar Pa | State of U.P. reported in [2007 (1)JIC 680 (Allahabad)], it has been opined by this very Courtthat if the accused is otherwise entitled to bail, the same should | Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted | 295 of 2022 | 2022-08-08 00:00:00 | 05-08-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020002142020 | UPHC020002142020_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: CRLP/10747/2020 of SANJAI KUMAR TIWARI Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU.SECY.HOME and ORS. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10747 of 2020
Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Tiwari
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home And Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kesarwa... | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10747 of 2020
Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Tiwari
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home And Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kesarwani,Dharmendra Kumar Bhatt
[SECTION] ## Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Mrs.... | 0 | 1,395 | 1 | 1 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | CRLP/10747/2020 of SANJAI KUMAR TIWARI Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU.SECY.HOME and ORS. | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10747 of 2020 Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Home And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kesarwani,Dharmendra Kumar Bhatt Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J. This | CRLP/10747/2020 of SANJAI KUMAR TIWARI | STATE OF U.P.THRU.SECY.HOME and ORS. | DISMISSED | 0585 of 2019 | 2022-07-05 00:00:00 | 07-07-2020 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020699502022 | UPHC020699502022_000 | 0 | 5 | Case: /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022
Applicant :- Vidya Sagar
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another
Counsel for ... | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022
Applicant :- Vidya Sagar
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Mithun Yadav,Syed Asaghar MehdiCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
Heard Sri Mithun Yadav, lea... | 0 | 4,047 | 2 | 2 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"Unnao as well assummoning"
] | /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022 Applicant :- Vidya Sagar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithun Yadav,Syed Asaghar Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J. Heard Sri Mithun | The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filedby the applicant namely Vidya Sagar with the prayer to quashthe entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1469 of 2021,Crime No.14 of 2020 | Having regard to the facts and circumstances and keeping inview the order intended to be passed, the service of notice onopposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with | DISPOSED | 1469 of 2021 | 2022-11-23 00:00:00 | 21-11-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020699502022 | UPHC020699502022_001 | 1 | 5 | Case: /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs.Central Bureau of Investigation and others : (2021) 10 SCC773 had held as under:
"3. We are inclined to accept ... | The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs.Central Bureau of Investigation and others : (2021) 10 SCC773 had held as under:
"3. We are inclined to accept the guidelines and make them apart of the order of the Court for the benefit of the Courtsbelow. The guidelines are as under:
"Categories/Types of ... | 3,628 | 7,213 | 2 | 4 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"Unnao as well assummoning"
] | /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022 Applicant :- Vidya Sagar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithun Yadav,Syed Asaghar Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J. Heard Sri Mithun | The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filedby the applicant namely Vidya Sagar with the prayer to quashthe entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1469 of 2021,Crime No.14 of 2020 | Having regard to the facts and circumstances and keeping inview the order intended to be passed, the service of notice onopposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with | DISPOSED | 1469 of 2021 | 2022-11-23 00:00:00 | 21-11-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020699502022 | UPHC020699502022_002 | 2 | 5 | Case: /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
6. We may also notice an aspect submitted by Mr. Luthra thatwhile issuing notice to consider bail, the trial Court is notprecluded from granting interim bail taki... | 6. We may also notice an aspect submitted by Mr. Luthra thatwhile issuing notice to consider bail, the trial Court is notprecluded from granting interim bail taking intoconsideration the conduct of the accused during theinvestigation which has not warranted arrest. On this aspectalso we would give our impr... | 6,518 | 10,042 | 4 | 5 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"Unnao as well assummoning"
] | /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022 Applicant :- Vidya Sagar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithun Yadav,Syed Asaghar Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J. Heard Sri Mithun | The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filedby the applicant namely Vidya Sagar with the prayer to quashthe entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1469 of 2021,Crime No.14 of 2020 | Having regard to the facts and circumstances and keeping inview the order intended to be passed, the service of notice onopposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with | DISPOSED | 1469 of 2021 | 2022-11-23 00:00:00 | 21-11-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020699502022 | UPHC020699502022_003 | 3 | 5 | Case: /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
(iii) Rejection of an application for exemption from personalappearance on any date of hearing or even at first instancedoes not amount to non-appearance despite servi... | (iii) Rejection of an application for exemption from personalappearance on any date of hearing or even at first instancedoes not amount to non-appearance despite service of summonsor absconding or failure to obey summons and the Court insuch a case shall not issue warrant of arrest and may eithergive direction to the a... | 9,459 | 12,702 | 5 | 6 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"Unnao as well assummoning"
] | /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022 Applicant :- Vidya Sagar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithun Yadav,Syed Asaghar Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J. Heard Sri Mithun | The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filedby the applicant namely Vidya Sagar with the prayer to quashthe entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1469 of 2021,Crime No.14 of 2020 | Having regard to the facts and circumstances and keeping inview the order intended to be passed, the service of notice onopposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with | DISPOSED | 1469 of 2021 | 2022-11-23 00:00:00 | 21-11-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020699502022 | UPHC020699502022_004 | 4 | 5 | Case: /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Siddharth v. State of UP : 2021SCC OnLine SC 615 opined as follows:
"9. We are in agreement with the aforesaid view of the HighCourts and w... | Hon'ble Supreme Court in Siddharth v. State of UP : 2021SCC OnLine SC 615 opined as follows:
"9. We are in agreement with the aforesaid view of the HighCourts and would like to give our imprimatur to the saidjudicial view. It has rightly been observed on consideration ofSection 170 Cr.P.C. that it does not impose a... | 12,609 | 16,139 | 6 | 7 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"Unnao as well assummoning"
] | /8566/2022 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8566 of 2022 Applicant :- Vidya Sagar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithun Yadav,Syed Asaghar Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J. Heard Sri Mithun | The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filedby the applicant namely Vidya Sagar with the prayer to quashthe entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1469 of 2021,Crime No.14 of 2020 | Having regard to the facts and circumstances and keeping inview the order intended to be passed, the service of notice onopposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with | DISPOSED | 1469 of 2021 | 2022-11-23 00:00:00 | 21-11-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020701002022 | UPHC020701002022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /7894/2022 of SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT OF TELECOMMUNICATION MINIS... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7894 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar SrivastavaRespondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt Of Telecommunication Ministry Of C... | Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7894 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar SrivastavaRespondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt Of Telecommunication Ministry Of Communication Delhi And 2Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vibhanshu Srivastava,Shishir Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Krishna Chandra Srivastava
[SECTION... | 0 | 1,373 | 1 | 1 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /7894/2022 of SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT OF TELECOMMUNICATION MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION DELHI AND 2 OTHERS | Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7894 of 2022 Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt Of Telecommunication Ministry Of Communication Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vibhanshu Srivastava,Shishir Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Krishna | /7894/2022 of SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA | UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT OF TELECOMMUNICATION MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION DELHI AND 2 OTHERS | DISPOSED | 2022-11-24 00:00:00 | 22-11-2022 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020326742022 | UPHC020326742022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /3948/2022 of SMT. SUFIYA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME, DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
[SECTION] ## Court No. - 2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3948 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Sufiya And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Hom... | [SECTION] ## Court No. - 2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3948 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Sufiya And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Deptt. Lko. And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Afzal HasanCounsel for Respondent :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.Hon'ble N... | 0 | 1,546 | 1 | 1 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /3948/2022 of SMT. SUFIYA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME, DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3948 of 2022 Petitioner :- Smt. Sufiya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Afzal Hasan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar | /3948/2022 of SMT. SUFIYA AND ANOTHER | STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME, DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS | DISPOSED | 2022-06-16 00:00:00 | 14-06-2022 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020418822022 | UPHC020418822022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /5310/2022 of MANEESH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND OTHERS (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
[SECTION] ## Court No. - 9
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5310 of 2022
Petitioner :- Maneesh And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And
Oth... | [SECTION] ## Court No. - 9
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5310 of 2022
Petitioner :- Maneesh And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And
OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Shobhit KantCounsel for Respondent :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Hea... | 0 | 1,375 | 1 | 1 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /5310/2022 of MANEESH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND OTHERS | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5310 of 2022 Petitioner :- Maneesh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shobhit Kant Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J. Heard. By means of this | /5310/2022 of MANEESH AND ANOTHER | STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND OTHERS | DISPOSED | 0204 of 2022 | 2022-07-28 00:00:00 | 23-07-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020545222018 | UPHC020545222018_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: WPIL/15803/2018 of PRADEEP KUMAR MAURYA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. and ORS. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: CONCLUSION
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 15803 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Maurya
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. ... | Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 15803 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Maurya
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And Ors.Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra PandeyCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Khan,D P Mishra
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
[SECTION... | 0 | 3,639 | 2 | 2 | conclusion | 95 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"preferably"
] | WPIL/15803/2018 of PRADEEP KUMAR MAURYA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. and ORS. | Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 15803 of 2018 Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Khan,D P Mishra Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. | ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commandingthe opposite parties 1 to 4 make enquiry and to take necessary legal actionagainst the opp. party no. 6 for illegal occupation | M/S Commercial Steal Limited,has held as under | ALLOWED | 5121 of 2021 | 2022-11-02 00:00:00 | 24-05-2018 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020012252005 | UPHC020012252005_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: WPIL/4540/2005 of SURYA PRAKASH Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPAL SECREATRY PANCHAYATI RAJ and 2 ORS (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 304
[TITLE] # HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW) ***
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 4540 of 2005
With WRIT C ... | Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 304
[TITLE] # HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW) ***
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 4540 of 2005
With WRIT C No - 4097 of 2005
Surya Prakash
.....Petitioner
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Amitabh Rai, Additional Chief Standing ... | 0 | 1,640 | 2 | 2 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 3 | [
"RAJESH BINDAL",
"CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR",
"JUDGE"
] | WPIL/4540/2005 of SURYA PRAKASH Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPAL SECREATRY PANCHAYATI RAJ and 2 ORS | OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW) *** ORDER 1. This order will dispose of two writ petition, namely, Public Interest Litigation Nos. 4540 of 2005 and 4097 of 2005. 2. The issue raised in these petitions is regarding validity of Article 243D(6) of the Constitution; Sections 6A, 7A, 18A and | Surya Prakash | State of U.P. and others | DISMISSED | 4540 of 2005 | 2022-09-21 00:00:00 | 14-07-2005 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020034182022 | UPHC020034182022_000 | 0 | 2 | Case: /188/2022 of RAMAKANT AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 188 of 2022
Appellant :- Ramakant And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home Lko And AnotherCounsel for Appella... | Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 188 of 2022
Appellant :- Ramakant And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home Lko And AnotherCounsel for Appellant :- S.C. Misra,Indresh Kumar Mishra,Rajat Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Heard learned cou... | 0 | 3,743 | 2 | 2 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"without sufÏcient cause"
] | /188/2022 of RAMAKANT AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER | Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 188 of 2022 Appellant :- Ramakant And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- S.C. Misra,Indresh Kumar Mishra,Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. 1. Heard | /188/2022 of RAMAKANT AND 2 OTHERS | STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER | ALLOWED | 3016 of 2021 | 2022-06-07 00:00:00 | 01-02-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020034182022 | UPHC020034182022_001 | 1 | 2 | Case: /188/2022 of RAMAKANT AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
(iii) The applicants shall remain present before thetrial court on each date fixed, either personally orthrough their counsel. In case of his absence,without ... | (iii) The applicants shall remain present before thetrial court on each date fixed, either personally orthrough their counsel. In case of his absence,without sufÏcient cause, the trial court mayproceed against him under Section 229-A of theIndian Penal Code.
(iv) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty... | 3,110 | 4,346 | 2 | 3 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"without sufÏcient cause"
] | /188/2022 of RAMAKANT AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER | Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 188 of 2022 Appellant :- Ramakant And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- S.C. Misra,Indresh Kumar Mishra,Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. 1. Heard | /188/2022 of RAMAKANT AND 2 OTHERS | STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER | ALLOWED | 3016 of 2021 | 2022-06-07 00:00:00 | 01-02-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020434382018 | UPHC020434382018_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: CAPL/1453/2018 of RAMESH KUMAR DIXIT Vs SRI SANJAY SINHA POSTED AS SECY.BASIC SHIKSHA PARISHAD and A... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1453 of 2018
Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar DixitOpposite Party :- Sri Sanjay Sinha Posted As Secy.Basic Shiksha Parishad... | Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1453 of 2018
Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar DixitOpposite Party :- Sri Sanjay Sinha Posted As Secy.Basic Shiksha Parishad And AnrCounsel for Applicant :- Shireesh Kumar
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
None has appeared to press the instant contempt petition which is of the year 2018.
... | 0 | 456 | 1 | 1 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | CAPL/1453/2018 of RAMESH KUMAR DIXIT Vs SRI SANJAY SINHA POSTED AS SECY.BASIC SHIKSHA PARISHAD and ANR | Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1453 of 2018 Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Dixit Opposite Party :- Sri Sanjay Sinha Posted As Secy.Basic Shiksha Parishad And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Shireesh Kumar Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. None has appeared to press the instant contempt petition | CAPL/1453/2018 of RAMESH KUMAR DIXIT | SRI SANJAY SINHA POSTED AS SECY.BASIC SHIKSHA PARISHAD and ANR | DISMISSED | 2022-08-10 00:00:00 | 29-05-2018 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020446642021 | UPHC020446642021_000 | 0 | 2 | Case: /4524/2021 of MOHD. SHAHJADE Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Court No. - 12Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4524 of 2021Applicant :- Mohd. ShahjadeOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Riy... | Court No. - 12Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4524 of 2021Applicant :- Mohd. ShahjadeOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad RiyazCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
The Court convened through video confere... | 0 | 4,059 | 2 | 2 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /4524/2021 of MOHD. SHAHJADE Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4524 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohd. Shahjade Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Riyaz Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. The Court convened through video | /4524/2021 of MOHD. SHAHJADE | STATE OF U.P. and ANR. | ALLOWED | 65 of 2021 | 2022-01-21 00:00:00 | 15-04-2021 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020446642021 | UPHC020446642021_001 | 1 | 2 | Case: /4524/2021 of MOHD. SHAHJADE Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
10. In case there is breach of any of the above conditions or incase it is otherwise found for any other reason the bail isrequired to be cancelled, it shall be open for the State or theappropriate author... | 10. In case there is breach of any of the above conditions or incase it is otherwise found for any other reason the bail isrequired to be cancelled, it shall be open for the State or theappropriate authority to move application for cancellation ofbail in accordance with law.
11. Under Part-III, Chapter - XVIII, Rule -... | 3,441 | 7,439 | 2 | 4 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /4524/2021 of MOHD. SHAHJADE Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4524 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohd. Shahjade Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Riyaz Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. The Court convened through video | /4524/2021 of MOHD. SHAHJADE | STATE OF U.P. and ANR. | ALLOWED | 65 of 2021 | 2022-01-21 00:00:00 | 15-04-2021 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020532462022 | UPHC020532462022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /6353/2022 of HARI OM PANDEY AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU.SECY.MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEPTT.O... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6353 of 2022
Petitioner :- Hari Om Pandey And Others
Respondent :- Union Of India Thru.Secy.Ministry Of Agriculture Deptt.Of Agri. And ... | Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6353 of 2022
Petitioner :- Hari Om Pandey And Others
Respondent :- Union Of India Thru.Secy.Ministry Of Agriculture Deptt.Of Agri. And Co-Operation, New Delhi AndorsCounsel for Petitioner :- Syed Ali RehanCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.Hon... | 0 | 2,427 | 2 | 2 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 1 | [
"accordingly"
] | /6353/2022 of HARI OM PANDEY AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU.SECY.MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEPTT.OF AGRI. AND CO-OPERATION, NEW DELHI ANDORS | Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6353 of 2022 Petitioner :- Hari Om Pandey And Others Respondent :- Union Of India Thru.Secy.Ministry Of Agriculture Deptt.Of Agri. And Co- Operation, New Delhi Andors Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Ali Rehan Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman | /6353/2022 of HARI OM PANDEY AND OTHERS | UNION OF INDIA THRU.SECY.MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEPTT.OF AGRI. AND CO-OPERATION, NEW DELHI ANDORS | DISPOSED | 2022-09-15 00:00:00 | 13-09-2022 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020423772016 | UPHC020423772016_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: WRIC/29852/2016 of NAGAR PANCHAYAT KHARGUPUR THRU CHAIRMAN KHARGUPUR and ANR Vs PRESIDING OFFICER LA... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29852 of 2016
Petitioner :- Nagar Panchayat Khargupur Thru Chairman Khargupur And AnrRespondent :- Presiding Officer Labour Court F... | Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29852 of 2016
Petitioner :- Nagar Panchayat Khargupur Thru Chairman Khargupur And AnrRespondent :- Presiding Officer Labour Court Faizabad And AnrCounsel for Petitioner :- Nitin SrivastavaCounsel for Respondent :- Pankaj Verma,Girdhari Lal Shukla,R.S Mishra
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.... | 0 | 723 | 1 | 1 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | WRIC/29852/2016 of NAGAR PANCHAYAT KHARGUPUR THRU CHAIRMAN KHARGUPUR and ANR Vs PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT FAIZABAD and ANR | Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29852 of 2016 Petitioner :- Nagar Panchayat Khargupur Thru Chairman Khargupur And Anr Respondent :- Presiding Officer Labour Court Faizabad And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Pankaj Verma,Girdhari Lal Shukla,R.S Mishra Hon'ble | WRIC/29852/2016 of NAGAR PANCHAYAT KHARGUPUR THRU CHAIRMAN KHARGUPUR and ANR | PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT FAIZABAD and ANR | DISMISSED | 2022-04-07 00:00:00 | 16-12-2016 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020422962018 | UPHC020422962018_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: CAPL/1071/2018 of KHUSHI MOHAMMAD Vs SRI MAYA SHANKAR YADAV S.D.M. TEHSIL COLONELGANJ and ANR. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1071 of 2018
Applicant :- Khushi MohammadOpposite Party :- Sri Maya Shankar Yadav S.D.M. Tehsil Colonelganj And Anr.Counsel f... | Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1071 of 2018
Applicant :- Khushi MohammadOpposite Party :- Sri Maya Shankar Yadav S.D.M. Tehsil Colonelganj And Anr.Counsel for Applicant :- Rishabh Tripathi,Shastri Prasad TripathiCounsel for Opposite Party :- CSC
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out. None appears on be... | 0 | 454 | 1 | 1 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | CAPL/1071/2018 of KHUSHI MOHAMMAD Vs SRI MAYA SHANKAR YADAV S.D.M. TEHSIL COLONELGANJ and ANR. | Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1071 of 2018 Applicant :- Khushi Mohammad Opposite Party :- Sri Maya Shankar Yadav S.D.M. Tehsil Colonelganj And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Rishabh Tripathi,Shastri Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- CSC Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. Case called | CAPL/1071/2018 of KHUSHI MOHAMMAD | SRI MAYA SHANKAR YADAV S.D.M. TEHSIL COLONELGANJ and ANR. | DISMISSED | 2022-10-20 00:00:00 | 25-04-2018 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020011922019 | UPHC020011922019_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: A227/15910/2019 of UZMA RASHID Vs THE DISTRICT JUDGE GONDA and ORS. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: CONCLUSION
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 15910 of 2019
Petitioner :- Uzma RashidRespondent :- The District Judge Gonda And Ors.Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar SrivastavaCounsel for Resp... | Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 15910 of 2019
Petitioner :- Uzma RashidRespondent :- The District Judge Gonda And Ors.Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar SrivastavaCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Kirti Mishra,R.K.Chaudhary
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel f... | 0 | 508 | 1 | 1 | conclusion | 95 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | A227/15910/2019 of UZMA RASHID Vs THE DISTRICT JUDGE GONDA and ORS. | Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 15910 of 2019 Petitioner :- Uzma Rashid Respondent :- The District Judge Gonda And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Kirti Mishra,R.K.Chaudhary Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned | A227/15910/2019 of UZMA RASHID | THE DISTRICT JUDGE GONDA and ORS. | DISMISSED | 2022-11-30 00:00:00 | 28-05-2019 | 2,022 | en | |||
UPHC020497422019 | UPHC020497422019_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: CRLP/32689/2019 of SMT.MADHURI DWIVEDI and ORS. Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME and ORS. (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 32689 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt.Madhuri Dwivedi And Ors.Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home And Ors.Counsel for Peti... | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 32689 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt.Madhuri Dwivedi And Ors.Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home And Ors.Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijai Kumar Tripathi,Udai Bhan PandeyCounsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
This writ petition... | 0 | 1,476 | 1 | 1 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | CRLP/32689/2019 of SMT.MADHURI DWIVEDI and ORS. Vs STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME and ORS. | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 32689 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt.Madhuri Dwivedi And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijai Kumar Tripathi,Udai Bhan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj | CRLP/32689/2019 of SMT.MADHURI DWIVEDI and ORS. | STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME and ORS. | DISMISSED | 0376 of 2019 | 2022-03-15 00:00:00 | 25-11-2019 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020137412022 | UPHC020137412022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /2849/2022 of BABBEY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2849 of 2022
[SECTION] ## Applicant :- Babbey
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 OthersCounsel for Applicant... | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2849 of 2022
[SECTION] ## Applicant :- Babbey
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 OthersCounsel for Applicant :- Shyamji Dixit,Amit Kumar PathakCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Heard learned couns... | 0 | 1,452 | 1 | 1 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /2849/2022 of BABBEY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS | Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2849 of 2022 Applicant :- Babbey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shyamji Dixit,Amit Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel | /2849/2022 of BABBEY | STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS | REJECTED | 526 of 2021 | 2022-03-23 00:00:00 | 21-03-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020481512022 | UPHC020481512022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /5301/2022 of ATUL KUMAR SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN SECY DEPTT OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 ... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: ARGUMENTS
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5301 of 2022
Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Shukla
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others... | Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5301 of 2022
Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Shukla
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pranav Pandey,Ashish Chandra AsthanaCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar,Shobhit Mohan Shukla
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Attau Rahman M... | 0 | 2,375 | 1 | 1 | arguments | 70 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 2 | [
"them",
"there shall no"
] | /5301/2022 of ATUL KUMAR SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN SECY DEPTT OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS | Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5301 of 2022 Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pranav Pandey,Ashish Chandra Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Attau | Heard learned counsel for the parties | Accordingly, keeping in view the proposition of law laid down as in theaforesaid case, the instant writ petition also deserves to be allowed | ALLOWED | 3410 of 2022 | 2022-08-24 00:00:00 | 22-08-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020380352022 | UPHC020380352022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /4457/2022 of INDRESH PRATAP SINGH ALIAS PIDHAI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND AN... (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: PARAGRAPH
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4457 of 2022
Applicant :- Indresh Pratap Singh Alias PidhaiOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. ... | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4457 of 2022
Applicant :- Indresh Pratap Singh Alias PidhaiOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And AnotherCounsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar TiwariCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
[SECTION] ## Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Present petition under Secti... | 0 | 1,774 | 1 | 1 | paragraph | 35 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /4457/2022 of INDRESH PRATAP SINGH ALIAS PIDHAI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER | Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4457 of 2022 Applicant :- Indresh Pratap Singh Alias Pidhai Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. 1. Present petition | /4457/2022 of INDRESH PRATAP SINGH ALIAS PIDHAI | STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER | ALLOWED | 176 of 2019 | 2022-07-13 00:00:00 | 11-07-2022 | 2,022 | en | ||
UPHC020298172022 | UPHC020298172022_000 | 0 | 1 | Case: /3460/2022 of LAHRI PRASAD Vs COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THRU. CHAIRMAN LKO. AND OTHERS (2022)
Court: Allahabad High Court
Section: BODY
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3460 of 2022
Petitioner :- Lahri Prasad
Respondent :- Cooperative Tribunal Thru. Chairman Lko. And OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar PathakCounsel... | Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3460 of 2022
Petitioner :- Lahri Prasad
Respondent :- Cooperative Tribunal Thru. Chairman Lko. And OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar PathakCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and to thelearned Additional Chief Stand... | 0 | 2,459 | 2 | 2 | body | 30 | true | Allahabad High Court | 9_13 | high_court | cishclko | 0 | [] | /3460/2022 of LAHRI PRASAD Vs COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THRU. CHAIRMAN LKO. AND OTHERS | Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3460 of 2022 Petitioner :- Lahri Prasad Respondent :- Cooperative Tribunal Thru. Chairman Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and to the learned | /3460/2022 of LAHRI PRASAD | COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THRU. CHAIRMAN LKO. AND OTHERS | REJECTED | 2022-06-01 00:00:00 | 28-05-2022 | 2,022 | en |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
Open India Law
Open, structured Indian primary law - plus the scrapers that build it. Every judgment of the Supreme Court of India and all 25 High Courts, the decisions of 15 tribunals and regulators, and Central, State and Union Territory legislation down to the individual section. Normalized to one schema, exclusively from official government sources.
| Volume | Period | |
|---|---|---|
| Court judgments | 12,848,644 | 1950 to 2025 |
| Tribunal and regulator matters | 813,168 | 1985 to 2026 |
| Enactments | 22,265 | 1806 to 2026 |
| Sections of legislation | 1,098,577 | individually searchable |
District and trial court decisions are not included.
Just want to read the documents?
Parquet is for pipelines. If you want to open an actual judgment or Act:
- Browse 22,264 Acts and regulations - pick a jurisdiction or a regulator, filter by title, click to open the PDF. Nothing to download.
- tribunals.vaquill.ai - tribunal and regulator decisions as PDFs, by forum, bench, party and date.
- news.vaquill.com - Indian courts, regulators and legal developments, readable rather than machine-readable.
- The raw file listing - every published file, if you want the Parquet directly.
- Every provision in the legislation and regulator files carries a
source_urlpointing at its own PDF, so you can go from a chunk straight to the document it came from. - Judgment source PDFs are on the AWS Open Data Registry (High Court, Supreme Court); we do not re-host them.
Courts
| Court | Judgments | Earliest | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of India | 34,954 | 1950 | 2025 |
| Patna High Court | 1,615,041 | 1967 | 2025 |
| Bombay High Court | 1,595,948 | 1953 | 2025 |
| Allahabad High Court | 1,498,250 | 1992 | 2025 |
| Madras High Court | 1,494,952 | 1997 | 2025 |
| Telangana High Court | 1,004,138 | 1963 | 2025 |
| Kerala High Court | 916,190 | 1950 | 2024 |
| Karnataka High Court | 581,276 | 1998 | 2025 |
| Chhattisgarh High Court | 508,791 | 1970 | 2025 |
| Punjab and Haryana High Court | 483,253 | 2008 | 2025 |
| Gujarat High Court | 411,638 | 1982 | 2025 |
| Madhya Pradesh High Court | 402,632 | 2000 | 2024 |
| Rajasthan High Court | 324,567 | 1989 | 2025 |
| Delhi High Court | 322,940 | 1960 | 2025 |
| Gauhati High Court | 285,714 | 2000 | 2025 |
| Orissa High Court | 283,063 | 1992 | 2025 |
| Andhra Pradesh High Court | 254,482 | 1995 | 2025 |
| Jharkhand High Court | 246,374 | 1993 | 2025 |
| Calcutta High Court | 202,565 | 1960 | 2025 |
| Himachal Pradesh High Court | 184,175 | 1970 | 2025 |
| Uttarakhand High Court | 123,853 | 1950 | 2025 |
| Jammu and Kashmir High Court | 40,289 | 2003 | 2025 |
| Tripura High Court | 18,942 | 2013 | 2025 |
| Manipur High Court | 7,903 | 2017 | 2025 |
| Meghalaya High Court | 6,261 | 2010 | 2025 |
| Sikkim High Court | 453 | 2000 | 2025 |
Tribunals and regulators
Matters are distinct cases. Reasoned decisions is the estimated subset that is a substantive decision rather than a procedural order sheet, from a sample of 150 documents per forum - about 348,516 of 2,112,201 documents. Size this tier on that number, not the document count. Each forum links to the scraper that built it.
Tribunal material is indexed by case, not yet by full text. It is 2.1M PDFs with no text layer, of which roughly 348,516 are reasoned decisions, and extracting them is a large OCR and parsing job rather than a quick pass. Supporting scripts live in scripts/tribunals/, with per-forum schema in scripts/tribunals/schema/.
If you are building on this corpus and need that tribunal text, or the same extraction run over your own sources, we do that work under contract. We have put roughly 16 million Indian legal PDFs through this pipeline. Email contact@vaquill.ai.
Regulators
Each regulator ships as its own file, in_<body>_regulations.parquet, so you can take the
Securities and Exchange Board of India without pulling the Reserve Bank of India.
| Issuing body | Instruments | Provisions |
|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) | 2,666 | 46,480 |
| Reserve Bank of India (RBI) | 2,640 | 104,143 |
| Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEFCC) | 1,399 | 116,227 |
| Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) | 1,233 | 4,252 |
| Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) | 1,144 | 88,310 |
| Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) | 834 | 22,720 |
| Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) | 558 | 13,752 |
| Ministry of Law and Justice (LAW) | 558 | 77,209 |
| State GST and tax authorities (TRIB) | 354 | 41,708 |
| Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) | 314 | 16,238 |
| Department of Financial Services (DFS) | 283 | 18,509 |
| Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) | 169 | 4,806 |
Legislation
Sourced from India Code. Every section is held and indexed separately.
Scrapers: Acts crawler · HTML section extractor · repealed Acts · gap re-scrape · amendment metadata · normalization pipeline
| Jurisdiction | Enactments | Sections | Earliest | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central | 13,720 | 628,863 | 1834 | 2026 |
| Assam | 987 | 12,429 | 1806 | 2020 |
| West Bengal | 715 | 32,238 | 1947 | 2024 |
| Rajasthan | 383 | 26,759 | 1860 | 2025 |
| Maharashtra | 379 | 30,271 | 1866 | 2025 |
| Chhattisgarh | 359 | 25,368 | 1860 | 2023 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 338 | 14,308 | 1885 | 2025 |
| Kerala | 322 | 19,164 | 1951 | 2025 |
| Tamil Nadu | 308 | 15,524 | 1864 | 2023 |
| Punjab | 303 | 18,037 | 1887 | 2025 |
| Bihar | 298 | 10,910 | 1894 | 2024 |
| Odisha | 282 | 11,370 | 1908 | 2025 |
| Karnataka | 279 | 29,485 | 1899 | 2025 |
| Telangana | 259 | 16,785 | 1837 | 2024 |
| Chandigarh | 256 | 21,805 | 1860 | 2018 |
| Uttarakhand | 244 | 10,531 | 1901 | 2022 |
| Gujarat | 226 | 12,868 | 1867 | 2025 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 216 | 17,477 | 1860 | 2023 |
| Haryana | 211 | 11,787 | 1897 | 2025 |
| Nagaland | 202 | 4,861 | 1954 | 2024 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 194 | 10,765 | 1952 | 2023 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 190 | 12,264 | 1954 | 2023 |
| Manipur | 187 | 4,560 | 1924 | 2023 |
| Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 169 | 15,619 | 1860 | 2018 |
| Goa | 154 | 14,539 | 1867 | 2024 |
| Jharkhand | 137 | 10,831 | 1887 | 2021 |
| Jammu and Kashmir | 137 | 9,223 | 1945 | 2020 |
| Tripura | 121 | 8,070 | 1926 | 2023 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 115 | 6,996 | 1891 | 2025 |
| Sikkim | 111 | 4,266 | 1975 | 2022 |
| Meghalaya | 105 | 5,550 | 1970 | 2024 |
| Delhi | 96 | 8,006 | 1870 | 2019 |
| Mizoram | 83 | 2,015 | 1988 | 2023 |
| Puducherry | 78 | 7,117 | 1897 | 2019 |
| Ladakh | 55 | 3,119 | 1945 | 2018 |
| Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 45 | 4,626 | 1894 | 2016 |
| Lakshadweep | 1 | 171 | 1995 | 1995 |
Parliament
Lok Sabha debates, Law Commission reports and gazette records: download-lok-sabha-debates.py.
Document pipeline
Indian courts and tribunals publish PDFs, very often scanned with no text layer. Turning those into clean, section-aware, citable text is the hard part, and it is what this project actually contributes.
| Stage | Script |
|---|---|
| PDF to markdown (text layer) | pymupdf4llm_parser.py |
| Unified parser across document kinds | unified_legal_parser.py |
| Section boundary detection | legal_section_detector.py, v2 |
| Section-aware chunking | legal_chunker.py |
| Metadata extraction | metadata_extractor_v3.py |
| Parallel chunking driver | run-chunking-parallel.py, full pipeline |
| OCR fallback (no text layer) | ocr-mistral.py |
| Chunk schema | UNIFIED_CHUNKING_SCHEMA.md |
| Read AWS Open Data HC parquet | aws-hc-parquet-reader.py |
A court-structure-aware variant is in scripts/pipeline/court/; chunking tests in scripts/pipeline/tests/.
What you get (output format)
Scrapers write JSONL - one normalized record per line - to $OUT_DIR (default ./data), plus source PDFs where the forum publishes them.
No database, no cloud storage, no credentials required.
Legislation records:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
act_id |
Stable identifier, e.g. IND_central_1860_45 |
title |
Short title of the Act |
chapter / section_number |
Position in the Act's hierarchy |
section_title / text |
Heading and text of the provision |
act_status / section_status |
in_force, repealed, spent |
state |
Jurisdiction (central or the State) |
year / amendment_count |
Enactment year, number of recorded amendments |
source_url |
Back-link to the authoritative government page |
Tribunal records:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
case_id |
Stable dedup key |
case_number / title |
Registry number and cause title |
bench / judges |
Bench and coram |
decision_date / year |
Date of the order |
doc_type / is_judgment |
Order, judgment, notice |
source_pdf_url |
Back-link to the tribunal's own PDF |
Download
from datasets import load_dataset
judgments = load_dataset("vaquill/open-india-law", "judgments", split="train")
acts = load_dataset("vaquill/open-india-law", "legislation", split="train")
regs = load_dataset("vaquill/open-india-law", "regulations", split="train")
kerala = load_dataset("vaquill/open-india-law", data_files="in_kerala_judgments.parquet")
sebi = load_dataset("vaquill/open-india-law", data_files="in_sebi_regulations.parquet")
huggingface.co/datasets/vaquill/open-india-law · mirror at oss-data-in.vaquill.ai
Snapshot v2026.08: 26 judgment files (32,572,660 chunks, 53.6 GB), 37 legislation files
and 12 regulator files (1,098,269 provisions between them). Judgment rows are one per chunk - group by case_id and order by
chunk_index to reassemble a judgment.
You do not need to run any scraper below to use the data. They are here so the corpus is reproducible and auditable.
Vector embeddings
Every chunk is published with its embedding, as Qdrant per-shard snapshots.
| Collection | Points | Shards | Size | Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|
legal_corpus_v1 |
19,595,718 | 4 | 272.8 GB | High Court and Supreme Court judgment chunks |
legal_corpus_v2 |
11,823,753 | 4 | 179.6 GB | Tribunal and regulator decision chunks |
acts_india |
1,098,577 | 2 | 11.2 GB | Legislation and regulatory provisions |
32,518,048 vectors, 463.6 GB, taken from Qdrant 1.16.3. Embeddings are Voyage AI voyage-4 series, 1024 dimensions, cosine distance. Each collection also carries a named sparse vector used for BM25 hybrid search.
Embed your queries with the voyage-4 series. Vectors from a different model live in a different space, so similarity scores against them are not meaningful.
Import into Qdrant
Snapshots are per-shard, so create the collection first with a matching shard_number, then recover each shard.
Qdrant fetches each snapshot itself and verifies the published SHA256 before accepting it.
# 1. create the collection
curl -X PUT http://localhost:6333/collections/legal_corpus_v1 \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
"shard_number": 4,
"vectors": {"dense": {"size": 1024, "distance": "Cosine", "on_disk": true,
"quantization_config": {"scalar": {"type": "int8", "quantile": 0.99}}}},
"sparse_vectors": {"sparse": {}}
}'
# 2. recover each shard straight from the mirror
BASE=https://oss-data-in.vaquill.ai/qdrant/legal_corpus_v1
for N in 0 1 2 3; do
SNAP=$(curl -s "$BASE/shard-$N/index.json" | jq -r .snapshot)
SUM=$(curl -s "$BASE/shard-$N/$SNAP.checksum")
curl -X PUT "http://localhost:6333/collections/legal_corpus_v1/shards/$N/snapshots/recover" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"location\": \"$BASE/shard-$N/$SNAP\", \"checksum\": \"$SUM\", \"priority\": \"snapshot\"}"
done
Use shard_number: 2 for acts_india.
Manifest of every shard, size and checksum: qdrant/index.json.
Full guide including verification and disk requirements: QDRANT_RESTORE.md.
Quick start
pip install -r requirements.txt
npm install # the TypeScript scrapers
cp .env.example .env # optional - only proxies and OCR need keys
# Legislation: India Code (Central + State Acts)
OUT_DIR=./data npx tsx scripts/legislation/indiacode-scraper.ts
# A tribunal (the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal):
OUT_DIR=./data npx tsx scripts/tribunals/itat-scraper.ts
# Turn scraped PDFs/HTML into normalized section records
OUT_DIR=./data python scripts/legislation/pipeline/run-pipeline.py --help
Every script is self-documenting - run it with --help, or read its module docstring for the exact source and options.
Sourcing and provenance
Government-only. Every record traces to a court, tribunal or government publisher, and keeps the source URL it was ingested from. No commercial law reporter and no third-party aggregator material enters this corpus.
Not every official Indian body publishes on a .gov.in domain, so the source list is not
filterable by suffix alone. These are the official portals of the bodies named: the Reserve
Bank of India on rbi.org.in, the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority on
pfrda.org.in, the Delhi Real Estate Regulatory Authority on erera.co.in, and the Bar
Council of India's All India Bar Examination on allindiabarexamination.com.
Scrapers identify as VaquillLegalBot/1.0 and respect each site's robots.txt.
The source judgment PDFs are not republished here. They are already public under CC BY 4.0 on the AWS Open Data Registry - High Court (~17.8M judgments, ~1.25 TiB) and Supreme Court, published by Dattam Labs. Re-hosting 1.36 TB of already-public files would add nothing, so this project publishes the layer they lack: extracted text, chunking, provenance and metadata.
The embeddings ARE published, as Qdrant snapshots. See Vector embeddings. Still out of scope: the citation graph, which is coupled to our own infrastructure.
What has been removed, and why
Identifying detail that a statute bars from publication. Indian courts anonymize sexual-offence victims in the large majority of cases, so this dataset does not exclude by statute category: doing so would remove roughly 180,000 judgments that are lawful to publish precisely because the court controlled the disclosure. What is redacted is the narrow band where identity actually leaks:
- names of relatives of victims and of protected children, where the court named them
- telephone numbers and email addresses
- Permanent Account Number, Indian Financial System Code and Aadhaar numbers, each only where the surrounding text identifies the number as such
That last condition matters. Those patterns are shape-only and Indian case numbers share the
shapes: WPCT0123456 is an Indian Financial System Code by shape and ABCDE1234F is a
Permanent Account Number by shape. Masking on shape alone corrupts the judgment text, so a
context word is required nearby.
Documents a court directed not be published, including in-camera matters. Those sit outside the statutory exception this corpus relies on.
Counts of what each rule removed are published with each snapshot.
Reporting a problem
If this corpus contains material that should not be public, write to contact@vaquill.ai
with the subject line Open India Law - redaction request. Directions of Indian courts and
tribunals are honoured. Because a published snapshot is a fixed artifact with published
checksums, corrections are made by publishing a superseding snapshot rather than editing one
in place.
Important caveats
1. Several sources serve Indian traffic only. India Code in particular returns "The specified URL is inaccessible at this time" to non-Indian IPs while serving its homepage normally.
Run those scrapers from an Indian host, or configure a proxy in .env.
If a run returns almost nothing and you are outside India, that is the usual cause.
2. Some scripts will stop working over time. These target live government websites, which get redesigned, move URLs, change HTML, or add anti-bot measures. A scraper that worked at publish time can break later. That usually needs a small parser update, not a rewrite. Please open an issue or PR - fixes to individual parsers are exactly where community help compounds.
3. A browser is needed for some forums. Most sources are plain HTTP.
A handful render via JavaScript and use Playwright - you will need its browsers installed (npx playwright install).
4. The tribunal corpus is PDF-only. These forums publish scanned or generated PDFs with no machine-readable text. Text extraction is a separate step and its quality varies by forum.
5. Snapshots are point-in-time, not current law. Indian legislation changes continuously and tribunal orders are appealed. Output is an archive as of the run date - always verify against the official source before relying on it. This is not legal advice.
Licensing and commercial use
- Scripts - Apache-2.0 (
LICENSE). Free, including commercial use. - Data / compilation - CC BY 4.0 (
data/LICENSE.md). Free with attribution. - The underlying legal text - a Government work under s.17(d) of the Copyright Act 1957, reproducible under s.52(1)(q). We hold no rights in it and grant none; your right to use it comes from the statute.
The dataset is free for everyone. You never need to email us or ask permission to use it, including for commercial products, as long as you attribute it.
Attribution is a condition our sources impose, not a preference of ours - the eCourts policy and those of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal all require the source to be prominently acknowledged. That is why this corpus is CC BY rather than CC0.
Want it built for you?
The dataset is free and always will be. Separately, we build legal data pipelines under contract: bulk extraction from scanned or non-machine-readable sources, OCR at scale, normalization into a schema you can query, and ongoing refresh.
That is what produced this corpus. If a law firm, publisher or legal-research product needs data at this scale and cannot get there from the raw sources, email contact@vaquill.ai.
Contributing
New-source parsers, coverage fixes, and - especially - repairs to scrapers that broke when a government site changed are welcome. Open a PR against the relevant script in the tables above.
Particularly useful right now: verified copyright/terms pages for the forums marked unverified in coverage.yml, captured from an Indian IP.
Most of those pages are unreachable from outside India, and each one unblocks a corpus.
Particularly useful: verified copyright and terms pages for the forums still marked
unknown in coverage.yml, captured from an Indian IP. Most are unreachable
from outside India, and each one unblocks a corpus.
Maintained by
Vaquill AI. Full measured coverage, including year-by-year tables and the held-vs-embedded reconciliation, is in COVERAGE.md.
Questions, ideas, or want to help? DM me on LinkedIn.
The law is public. Making it usable should be too.
- Downloads last month
- 114