Datasets:
The WANDERING arc: where an agent's decision to stop is known vs. controllable (6 papers + a tool)
I shipped a 6-paper arc (all CC-BY) + a pip-installable tool on a failure I call WANDERING: long-horizon coding agents that stay internally sure they solved the task but never emit the finish action, burning their whole budget — a ~34% blind spot for agent monitoring.
The finding. The decision to stop is decodable mid-stream (an interpretable SAE "task-done" feature predicts finish at AUROC 0.91) yet causally inert there. But it is writable late: patching a task-matched state into the last ~12 of 64 layers makes a stuck agent emit a real finish 42% of the time (p=0.031). The knowledge–action gap on agents is a layer gap — known mid-stream, writable late. Done solo in ~5 weeks on one Colab GPU.
Tool — decision-locator (find & steer the layer where any tool-calling decision is committed, on any open model, runs on a laptop):
pip install git+https://github.com/OpenInterpretability/decision-locator
decision-locator demo --model gpt2
Papers (Zenodo, CC-BY-4.0):
- #1 Tool-Entropy Collapse — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20368600
- #2 The Right Locus Is Still Not a Rescue Lever — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20490278
- #3 Multi-Channel Signatures — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20490284
- #4 Modality Matters — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20490286
- #5 The Verdict Is Not the Lever — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20532769
- #6 The Lever Is Late — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20534219
- companion (No Better Than Behavioral) — https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20500053
All papers: https://openinterp.org/research · Tool: https://github.com/OpenInterpretability/decision-locator · This dataset mirrors the PDFs. Feedback welcome.
nice work bro, I will check them today
