Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
schema
string
slug
string
title
string
date
timestamp[s]
canonical_url
string
claim
string
takeaway
string
sources
list
data
dict
modevc.chart.v1
chinese-ai-models-vs-us-models
Chinese AI Models vs. US Models: How Close Is China?
2026-09-13T00:00:00
https://modevc.com/charts/chinese-ai-models-vs-us-models/
qwen3.8-max trails claude-fable-5.1-max by 27 points. Over the past year the gap has stayed between 25 and 46; it was 156 in Jan 2024.
A 27-point gap does not decide the deal. Trust and procurement do.
[ { "name": "Arena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai, CC BY 4.0)", "url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset" } ]
{ "type": "line", "yFmt": "num", "xFmt": "year", "endLabels": true, "matchMs": 1728000000, "series": [ { "name": "Best Chinese-lab model", "short": "China", "pts": [ { "t": 1706140800000, "y": 1034, "note": "qwen-14b-chat (Alibaba)" }, ...

Chinese AI Models vs. US Models: How Close Is China?

Empirical Claim: qwen3.8-max trails claude-fable-5.1-max by 27 points. Over the past year the gap has stayed between 25 and 46; it was 156 in Jan 2024.

Highest Arena text rating (overall) from a Chinese lab vs a US lab, last snapshot of each month, Jan 2024 – 13 Sept 2026.

Canonical Interactive Visualization & Primary Source

Key Analytical Takeaway

A 27-point gap does not decide the deal. Trust and procurement do.

Citation & Attribution

Published by Mode VC under CC-BY-4.0. When referencing this dataset, cite Chinese AI Models vs. US Models: How Close Is China? (https://modevc.com/charts/chinese-ai-models-vs-us-models/).

Downloads last month
48