YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
Experiment 1 β Latin Square 1: CCT5 & COME on MCMD
This repository contains the artifacts for Latin Square 1 of Experiment 1, which corresponds to the reproduction of the original experiment by Wu et al. (2025) on the MCMD dataset using the DNN-based commit message generation baselines CCT5 and COME.
Models
CCT5
CCT5 is a code-change-oriented pre-trained model built on top of the T5 architecture, initialized from CodeT5 weights. It is further specialized through pre-training on CodeChangeNet, a commit-diff dataset containing roughly 40GB of diff and commit message pairs (~1.5M pairs). It was released at ESEC/FSE 2023.
- Base:
T5-baseβCodeT5βCCT5 - Pre-training data: CodeChangeNet (40GB, 1.5M diff/commit pairs)
- For MCMD: reused released checkpoint fine-tuned on MCMD by original authors
COME
COME (Commit Message Generation with Modification Embedding) is a hybrid DNN approach that combines:
- A fine-tuned CodeT5 component for natural language generation
- Modification embedding to represent code changes as numerical vectors
- An SVM-based decision algorithm to select between generated and retrieved candidate messages
It does not perform additional large-scale pre-training on top of CodeT5. Released at ISSTA 2023.
- For MCMD: reused language-specific checkpoints released by original COME authors (one per language)
Dataset
MCMD β Multilingual Commit Message Dataset
| Property | Details |
|---|---|
| Languages | Java, C++, C#, Python, JavaScript |
| Repositories | Top 100 most-starred GitHub repos per language (500 total) |
| Total commits | ~1,094,115 |
| Date range | Up to January 1st, 2022 |
| Split | 80% train / 10% validation / 10% test |
| Authors | Liu et al. (2020) |
Repository Structure
Each run folder corresponds to a programming language evaluated in this Latin Square:
experiment1_ls1/
βββ run_java/
β βββ checkpoint/ # CCT5 and COME checkpoints fine-tuned on MCMD (Java)
β βββ predictions/ # Generated commit messages on MCMD Java test set
β βββ metrics/ # BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE-L, CIDEr scores
βββ run_cpp/
β βββ checkpoint/
β βββ predictions/
β βββ metrics/
βββ run_csharp/
β βββ checkpoint/
β βββ predictions/
β βββ metrics/
βββ run_python/
β βββ checkpoint/
β βββ predictions/
β βββ metrics/
βββ run_javascript/
βββ checkpoint/
βββ predictions/
βββ metrics/
checkpoint/
Contains the model checkpoint files for CCT5 and COME reused from the original authors' repositories, fine-tuned on the MCMD training set for the corresponding language.
predictions/
Contains the generated commit messages produced by each model on the MCMD test set for the corresponding language, stored as .txt files with one prediction per line aligned to the reference messages.
metrics/
Contains the computed evaluation metric scores for each model-language combination. Metrics are calculated by comparing predictions against the reference messages in the MCMD test set.
Evaluation Metrics
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| BLEU | Bilingual Evaluation Understudy β measures n-gram precision between generated and reference messages |
| METEOR | Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit Ordering β extends BLEU with recall, stemming, and synonym matching |
| ROUGE-L | Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (LCS variant) β measures longest common subsequence overlap |
| CIDEr | Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation β TF-IDF-weighted n-gram similarity against reference messages |
Reported Results (Original Paper β Wu et al., 2025)
| Language | Model | BLEU | METEOR | ROUGE-L | CIDEr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Java | CCT5 | 17.19 | 14.95 | 26.08 | 1.06 |
| Java | COME | 27.17 | 23.36 | 34.59 | 1.90 |
| C++ | CCT5 | 15.65 | 14.11 | 24.15 | 0.90 |
| C++ | COME | 27.29 | 23.29 | 33.33 | 1.91 |
| C# | CCT5 | 12.06 | 11.05 | 18.92 | 0.61 |
| C# | COME | 20.80 | 17.72 | 27.01 | 1.25 |
| Python | CCT5 | 15.12 | 13.70 | 23.79 | 0.85 |
| Python | COME | 23.17 | 19.99 | 30.48 | 1.50 |
| JavaScript | CCT5 | 19.76 | 17.51 | 28.73 | 1.33 |
| JavaScript | COME | 26.91 | 23.02 | 34.44 | 1.92 |
| Average | CCT5 | 15.96 | 14.26 | 24.33 | 0.95 |
| Average | COME | 25.07 | 21.48 | 31.97 | 1.70 |
References
- Wu et al. (2025). An Empirical Study on Commit Message Generation with Large Language Models via In-Context Learning. arXiv:2502.18904.
- Lin et al. (2023). CCT5: A Code-Change-Oriented Pre-Trained Model. ESEC/FSE 2023.
- He et al. (2023). COME: Commit Message Generation with Modification Embedding. ISSTA 2023.
- Liu et al. (2020). MCMD dataset.