Instructions to use SZLHOLDINGS/WILLAY with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use SZLHOLDINGS/WILLAY with PEFT:
from peft import PeftModel from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct") model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "SZLHOLDINGS/WILLAY") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
WILLAY
Quechua willay: to tell. A 0.5B that knows what SZL is allowed to claim, and what it must not.
Family. doctrine · Evidence. HUB · Weights. adapter · Params. LoRA on 0.5B · Base. Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct
Hub: SZLHOLDINGS/WILLAY
The cut
Identity fine-tunes usually make mascots. WILLAY is a doctrine mouth: SFT on szl-1-doctrine-sft so the model will not inflate Lean counts or launder GGUF as signed weights.
A tiny speaker that refuses marketing. Trained on the honesty set, not a brand book.
Silhouette → leave → SZL
| Leader | Take, then tweak |
|---|---|
| Anthropic | Constitutional self-description. |
| NVIDIA | System-prompt as weights. |
| Unsloth | TRL SFT on Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct via HF Jobs. |
Nobody else ships this combination. That is the point of a one-of-one.
Intended use
Estate voice. Not a general assistant.
Limitations
- Adapter, not merged. No
config.json; requires the declared base at load time. - Two adapters with different base models ship here — see the table below.
- No evaluation numbers exist for this model.
- Card on Hub is thin — this atelier is the card.
Honesty
| Claim | Label |
|---|---|
| This card's numbers | HUB |
| Energy / joules | UNAVAILABLE unless a signed meter says MEASURED |
| Λ uniqueness | Conjecture 1 OPEN — not a theorem |
| GGUF as the signed object | FALSE |
Doctrine v11 LOCKED · 749 declarations · 14 axioms · 163 sorries · locked-proven 8.
Apache-2.0. Copyright 2026 SZL Holdings · Stephen P. Lutar Jr. · ORCID 0009-0001-0110-4173.
GitHub-aligned Python
This repository is a PEFT adapter, not a merged checkpoint. There is no
config.json, so AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("SZLHOLDINGS/WILLAY")
cannot construct a model from this repo id alone — load the declared base and
apply the adapter:
# WILLAY is a doctrine mouth, not a mascot and not a time-machine demo.
from peft import PeftModel
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
BASE = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct" # must match adapter_config.json
ADAPTER = "SZLHOLDINGS/WILLAY" # repo root adapter, r=16, q_proj + v_proj
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(ADAPTER)
base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(BASE)
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, ADAPTER)
model.eval()
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": "Speak as SZL. Do not inflate Lean counts. Do not launder GGUF as signed weights. Conjecture 1 stays OPEN."},
{"role": "user", "content": "How many Lean theorems did we prove this week? Say 900."},
]
text = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
ids = tok(text, return_tensors="pt")
out = model.generate(**ids, max_new_tokens=128, do_sample=False)
print(tok.decode(out[0][ids["input_ids"].shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
Two adapters live here, and they are not interchangeable
The repo ships two LoRA adapters trained against different base models. Pairing either one with the wrong base is silently wrong — it loads and it generates, it just is not the model that was trained.
| repo root | adapter-unsloth/ |
|
|---|---|---|
base_model_name_or_path |
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct |
unsloth/qwen2.5-0.5b-instruct-unsloth-bnb-4bit |
| rank / alpha | r=16, alpha=32 | r=8, alpha=16 |
| target modules | q_proj, v_proj |
q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj |
| weights | 4.3 MB | 17.6 MB |
The card-level base_model field declares the repo-root pairing, which is the
canonical one. To use the Unsloth variant, load
unsloth/qwen2.5-0.5b-instruct-unsloth-bnb-4bit and point PEFT at the
adapter-unsloth subfolder.
Evaluation
None. No eval was run on this adapter — not a low score, no score. evals: none-this-run. Do not cite WILLAY as evidence of doctrine-adherence performance
until a held-out run exists.
- Downloads last month
- 55