ACT โ€” v6 blue89 180ep, GelSight 320x240

  • Dataset: Kaz55/dg5f_ur5e_v6_blue89_180ep_gs320 โ€” 180 episodes / 208,109 frames
  • GelSight: 320x240
  • RealSense: 640x480
  • Policy: ACT, chunk_size=60, n_action_steps=60
  • Training: 100,000 steps (~3.84 epochs), batch 8, seed 1000

Inputs

observation.state (26) + RealSense x2 + GelSight x2

observation.velocity and observation.effort exist in the dataset but are deliberately excluded โ€” feature auto-derivation would otherwise feed them to the policy and add a second difference between runs.

Sweep

GelSight model loss
500x375 act-v6-blue89-180ep-gs500-ac60 0.132
320x240 act-v6-blue89-180ep-gs320-ac60 0.134

Caveat

Different dataset from the blue_180ep sweep (186 ep / 186,152 frames) โ€” losses are not comparable across the two. On the related combined sweep, training loss was identical at every GelSight resolution including no-GelSight-at-all, so treat loss as a sanity check rather than evidence about tactile resolution; that needs on-robot evaluation.

Downloads last month
14
Safetensors
Model size
51.7M params
Tensor type
F32
ยท
Video Preview
loading