Creative Priming: Decoupling Process from Product to Escape the Creative Paradox
Abstract
A method called creative priming uses a priming model trained with GRPO to generate prompt-specific primers that help a response model produce novel, high-quality, and diverse outputs by separating the creative process from response generation.
Many of the most consequential advances promised by AI, from curing diseases and inventing new technologies to formulating new scientific theories, are fundamentally creative acts. Yet creativity is uniquely difficult to learn because it faces a creative paradox: learning to repeat past examples of creative success makes those specific examples more likely to recur, inhibiting the very creativity desired. This work argues that creativity is better modeled as an explicit process rather than as a property of individual artifacts, and proposes to learn the underlying generative principles behind the creative process. In particular, to escape the paradox, we introduce creative priming (CP), wherein a trained priming model generates a prompt-specific primer that assists a response model in being creative, explicitly decoupling the creative process from response generation. The priming model learns through GRPO, rewarding primers that lead to responses that are novel, high-quality, and diverse, thereby reinforcing the process that yields creative responses without reinforcing any specific response.
Community
Many of the most consequential advances promised by AI, from curing diseases and inventing new technologies to formulating new scientific theories, are fundamentally creative acts. Yet creativity is uniquely difficult to learn because it faces a creative paradox: learning to repeat past examples of creative success makes those specific examples more likely to recur, inhibiting the very creativity desired. This work argues that creativity is better modeled as an explicit process rather than as a property of individual artifacts, and proposes to learn the underlying generative principles behind the creative process. In particular, to escape the paradox, we introduce creative priming (CP), wherein a trained priming model generates a prompt-specific primer that assists a response model in being creative, explicitly decoupling the creative process from response generation. The priming model learns through GRPO, rewarding primers that lead to responses that are novel, high-quality, and diverse, thereby reinforcing the process that yields creative responses without reinforcing any specific response.
I really like the idea of separating the creative process from the answer itself. How do you tell that a primer made the response more creative, and not just different?
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Reinforcing Agentic Creativity in Scientific Ideation with Night Science (2026)
- HARPO: Hallucination-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Faithful and Creative Language Generation (2026)
- IdeaScientist: Orchestrating Agents for Grounded Scientific Ideation (2026)
- IdeaAnchor: Teaching LLMs to Turn Literature into Research Ideas (2026)
- Evaluating LLM Creativity through Long-Tail Performance (2026)
- MindFlow: Mind Supernet Powered Thinking Flows for Research Idea Innovation (2026)
- Design Creativity Bench: Measuring creativity in LLM-Generated UI (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2611.11740 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 2
LilaSciences/novelty-bench-llm-judge
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper