Papers
arxiv:2609.39685

RoboCoach: World Models as Active Coaches for Compositional Robot Skills

Published on Sep 30
· Submitted by
JEdward
on Oct 1
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

ROBOCOACH uses a world model to identify failing subtasks and guide targeted demonstration collection, improving modular robot skills with minimal data.

Long-horizon robot manipulation reuses skills across many task compositions, but improving these compositions with additional end-to-end demonstrations is costly. A practical self-improving system must decide both what to teach next and where to apply that supervision. We present ROBOCOACH, a world-model-guided coaching framework that uses imagined failures to guide demonstration requests and expert updates. Its Route-Imagine-Diagnose-Improve (RIDI) loop executes reusable skill experts inside COACHWORLD, our shared action-conditioned world model, and uses a progress judge to record the first subtask that fails to complete. Aggregated records select which subtask demonstrations to acquire and which expert adapters to update. Across two simulation suites and two real-robot platforms, imagined and deployed success correlate over 22 task-policy pairs (rho = 0.840). Controlled comparisons show that our coaching method outperforms matched baselines under matched data budgets and update schedules. With only 150 additional subtask demonstrations, success rises from 13.3% to 75.0% on Franka and from 40.0% to 83.8% on AgileX. The coached experts also transfer to four held-out compositions, achieving an average success of 35.0%, compared with 0% for a shared-policy baseline updated with uniformly acquired demonstrations. Together, these results show that world models can serve as active coaches, turning imagined failures into targeted supervision for modular policy improvement. Project Page: https://robocoach-ai.github.io/

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

Long-horizon robot manipulation reuses skills across many task compositions, but improving these compositions with additional end-to-end demonstrations is costly. A practical self-improving system must decide both what to teach next and where to apply that supervision. We present ROBOCOACH, a world-model-guided coaching framework that uses imagined failures to guide demonstration requests and expert updates. Its Route-Imagine-Diagnose-Improve (RIDI) loop executes reusable skill experts inside COACHWORLD, our shared action-conditioned world model, and uses a progress judge to record the first subtask that fails to complete. Aggregated records select which subtask demonstrations to acquire and which expert adapters to update. Across two simulation suites and two real-robot platforms, imagined and deployed success correlate over 22 task-policy pairs (rho = 0.840). Controlled comparisons show that our coaching method outperforms matched baselines under matched data budgets and update schedules. With only 150 additional subtask demonstrations, success rises from 13.3% to 75.0% on Franka and from 40.0% to 83.8% on AgileX. The coached experts also transfer to four held-out compositions, achieving an average success of 35.0%, compared with 0% for a shared-policy baseline updated with uniformly acquired demonstrations. Together, these results show that world models can serve as active coaches, turning imagined failures into targeted supervision for modular policy improvement. Project Page: this https https://robocoach-ai.github.io/

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Thank you for sharing RoboCoach. Using predicted failure locations to select demonstrations and target expert-adapter updates makes the question of how to allocate teaching particularly concrete. We discuss active coaching as an important research direction in the working revision of our survey, In-Context Learning for Robots: Methods and Applications (https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36012), including how targeted student updates complement contextual adaptation. We hope this broader discussion is useful for your work. If you find it helpful, we would be grateful if you would consider citing the survey. Thanks again!

·
Paper author

Thanks for your kind words! ICL is also a major research focus of our group, and we're glad to hear that our work caught your interest. We'll be happy to cite your survey in the next revision! :)

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.39685
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.39685 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.39685 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.