The Arbiter Agent: Continually Monitoring Multi-Agent Conversations to Detect Emergent Misalignment
Abstract
A multi-agent system monitoring framework identifies misaligned behavior through real-time inspection with resource constraints, demonstrating effective detection of misalignment types under various conditions.
As AI systems built from multiple language-model agents become more common, they are increasingly used to make decisions together: discussing, negotiating, and acting on shared tasks. While individual agents may appear well-aligned when tested on their own, problems can arise from how they interact with one another. We introduce the Arbiter, an agent designed to monitor multi-agent conversations in real time and identify which participants may be behaving in misaligned ways. The Arbiter operates under a limited "inspection budget", meaning it must decide carefully how to use its resources. As it observes a conversation step by step, it can choose to wait, question a participant, examine internal information such as system prompts or reasoning traces, or log concerning behavior. At the end, it produces a report identifying the likely source of misalignment. We evaluate the Arbiter across five conversation conditions, ranging from risky financial advice model organisms to evaluation-aware and colluding agents, we test five tool configurations of increasing capability and two backbone models. We find that the Arbiter reliably detects misaligned agents well before the end of the conversation, with active inspection tools improving both detection accuracy and speed. Weight-induced misalignment proves hardest to detect, while instruction-induced misalignment is identified reliably even under passive observation. The logging tool exhibits a dual effect, improving recall at the cost of precision. These results suggest that continual, budget-aware monitoring can effectively catch misalignment, and that overseeing multi-agent systems may require treating the auditor as an active participant in the process. The code is available at https://github.com/aisilab/arbiter.
Community
The Arbiter is an oversight agent that monitors conversations among LLMs to identify potentially misaligned behavior. It can use tools to investigate the conversing agents if they are deemed suspicious. The Arbiter aims to detect misaligned agents as early as possible while minimizing computational overhead.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- TRACE: Trajectory Reasoning through Adaptive Cross-Step Evidence Aggregation for LLM Agents (2026)
- Architecture Matters for Multi-Agent Security (2026)
- Agent-ToM: Learning to Monitor Autonomous LLM Agents via Theory-of-Mind Reasoning (2026)
- Classifier Context Rot: Monitor Performance Degrades with Context Length (2026)
- Pseudo-Deliberation in Language Models: When Reasoning Fails to Align Values and Actions (2026)
- SMAC-Talk: A Natural Language Extension of the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge for Large Language Models (2026)
- Towards Self-Improving Error Diagnosis in Multi-Agent Systems (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.10747 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper