Papers
arxiv:2606.05557

AURA: Intent-Directed Probing for Implicit-Need Surfacing in Situated LLM Agents

Published on Jun 4
· Submitted by
Yang Lee
on Jun 5
Authors:
,
,
,

Abstract

AURA enhances query answering by incorporating an intent inference step that estimates implicit needs and optimizes tool usage through gap scoring, achieving better implicit-need coverage and reduced probe consumption compared to standard approaches.

A situated query like "where is Lin Wei?" often encodes more than its literal content: the user may also want to know whether Lin Wei is free, in a good mood, or worth interrupting now. Standard tool-use agents answer the literal question and stop. AURA inserts an inference step between scene perception and tool use that produces an IntentFrame: a structured estimate of the implicit need with a scalar gap score that controls per-query probe budget and tool selection. On a 100-query four-scene implicit-intent benchmark, AURA improves implicit-need coverage over ReAct-style probing (Delta = +0.07, p < 10^-6); three of four scenes are individually significant, the gain reproduces on a second backbone, and a prompt ablation attributes the lift to gap calibration rather than answer memorisation. On factual lookup the controller trades raw accuracy for 82% fewer probes and zero forbidden-tool violations on a privacy-sensitive slice; scope conditions are detailed in Limitations. Code, simulator, and benchmark are released at https://github.com/innovation64/AURA.

Community

Paper submitter

AURA: Intent-Directed Probing for Implicit-Need Surfacing in Situated LLM Agents

Situated queries often carry implicit needs beyond their literal wording — asking "where is Lin Wei?" may really be asking "are they free to interrupt?" Standard ReAct-style agents take such queries at face value and either miss the underlying need or over-probe with unnecessary tool calls.
AURA adds an IntentFrame inference step that estimates the implicit need behind a query and computes a gap score that directs tool selection — probing only when there's a genuine information gap to close.
On a 100-query benchmark, AURA improves coverage of implicit needs over ReAct-style baselines while significantly cutting unnecessary tool probes.
Code, simulator, and benchmark: https://github.com/innovation64/AURA

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606.05557
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05557 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05557 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.