Blame for data.json

{
  "controls": {
    "aibom": [
      {
        "action": "Define included component classes, environments and discovery methods; enumerate inaccessible or unsupported components.",
        "change_trigger": "The system boundary or discovery method changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-SCOPE",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Declared scope and exclusion list",
          "Discovery coverage check"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Inventory scope and blind spots",
        "owner_role": "AI platform owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An inventory is treated as complete although the scanner cannot observe some components.",
        "rollback": "Pause promotion for unresolved critical inventory gaps; restore the last understood boundary without claiming scanner completeness.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Compare one known component of each in-scope class against the inventory and record omissions.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Record stable component identifiers, release versions and available content digests; mark unavailable identities explicitly.",
        "change_trigger": "A model, package, prompt, data snapshot or build changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-IDENTITY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Version and digest manifest",
          "Inventory diff"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Immutable component identity",
        "owner_role": "Release engineering owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A mutable label hides a component change.",
        "rollback": "Block the unidentified component and restore a known compatible identity after verifying that it remains supported and authorized.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Change a fixture version or digest and confirm the inventory diff exposes it.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Record origin, producer, acquisition path and referenced provenance separately from verification status.",
        "change_trigger": "Origin, producer, acquisition path or provenance policy changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-PROVENANCE",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Origin references",
          "Provenance verification record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Traceable provenance",
        "owner_role": "Supply-chain security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A component cannot be linked to its asserted origin.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine the component if required provenance cannot be verified; retain the evidence used for the decision.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Trace a selected component to the retained origin record; mark unverifiable assertions as unknown.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Record the applicable license or terms reference, proposed use, open questions and the human decision owner.",
        "change_trigger": "License, terms, intended use, data access or distribution changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-RIGHTS",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Version-specific terms reference",
          "Named rights and access decision"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Permitted use and data access",
        "owner_role": "Rights reviewer with the data owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A release depends on a component or dataset whose allowed use is unresolved.",
        "rollback": "Block the affected use or distribution and select a reviewed permitted substitute; preserve the rights decision history.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Inspect the exact version and use decision; do not treat a scanner license label as approval.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "When attestations are required, verify the subject digest, signature identity and expected producer policy before accepting the claim.",
        "change_trigger": "Subject digest, signer trust, producer policy or verification tooling changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-ATTESTATION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Attestation and subject digest",
          "Trust-policy version",
          "Positive and negative verification records"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Attestation subject and trust verification",
        "owner_role": "Supply-chain security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A valid-looking attestation is accepted for the wrong artifact or producer.",
        "rollback": "Reject the untrusted attestation and block the component; re-admit only after verification against a reviewed policy.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Reject fixtures with a changed subject digest, untrusted signer or unexpected producer; retain the verification outcome.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Compare the candidate inventory with the approved baseline and route material changes to named component owners.",
        "change_trigger": "Any in-scope inventory item or its permissions change.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-DIFF",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Baseline and candidate inventories",
          "Material diff and decision log"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Material inventory change review",
        "owner_role": "Release engineering owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A dependency change reaches production without an owned review.",
        "rollback": "Hold promotion and restore a compatible reviewed inventory after checking migrations and external effects.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Introduce a new component and a permission change in a fixture; confirm both appear in the review record.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Bind the inventory to an enforceable admission decision and a current revocation process.",
        "change_trigger": "Admission policy, trust status, exposure or revocation information changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-ADMISSION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Admission policy and decisions",
          "Revocation exercise"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Dependency admission and revocation",
        "owner_role": "Platform security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A revoked or disallowed dependency remains available at runtime.",
        "rollback": "Revoke the affected capability and use a reviewed supported fallback; deployment rollback must not reintroduce revoked components.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Attempt admission of a permitted and a revoked fixture; confirm both decisions are attributable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Assign a responsible maintainer and accountable release owner; define review triggers and retain change history.",
        "change_trigger": "Team ownership, release process, component lifecycle or evidence location changes.",
        "config": "aibom",
        "control_id": "AIBOM-OWNERSHIP",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Owner assignment",
          "Review schedule and trigger record",
          "Change history"
        ],
        "field_origin": "Original engineering proposal; the source compares tools and does not contain these controls.",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Inventory ownership and maintenance",
        "owner_role": "System owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Inventory evidence becomes stale without an accountable maintainer.",
        "rollback": "Pause unowned changes and assign an accountable replacement before reopening promotion.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:13c2f516b1aaa41bea93a799cc4999d38490e365faa1c8a31eeb4731593fd49a",
        "source_native_id": null,
        "source_payload_json": "null",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/aibom-tools-compared/blob/462388081577ba7155ace498cb7555304a01fbb7/data/tools.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The selected release and its model, prompt, data, tool and runtime dependency inventory.",
        "verification": "Simulate an ownership transfer and verify that review and escalation routes remain reachable.",
        "verified_at": null
      }
    ],
    "drift": [
      {
        "action": "Inspect affected intent and language slices. Compare downstream outcomes and expand the holdout set.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-INPUT_SHIFT",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Input distribution shift",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting input distribution shift goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Do not roll back for input shift alone. Consider a release rollback only if a matched-cohort evaluation links degradation to that release.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "input_shift",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"gt\", \"definition\": \"Total variation distance = 0.5 \\u00d7 sum of absolute differences in category proportions between current and reference prompts. Freeze the same intent/language taxonomy and include an unknown category. Denominator: prompts with a recorded category.\", \"id\": \"input_shift\", \"max\": 1, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Input distribution shift\", \"rationale\": \"A changed request mix can invalidate an old evaluation set without proving a quality regression.\", \"response\": \"Inspect affected intent and language slices. Compare downstream outcomes and expand the holdout set.\", \"rollback\": \"Do not roll back for input shift alone. Consider a release rollback only if a matched-cohort evaluation links degradation to that release.\", \"sampleClass\": \"requests\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S2\", \"url\": \"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/gen-ai-lifecycle-operational-excellence/prod-monitoring-drift.html\"}, {\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S3\", \"url\": \"https://docs.evidentlyai.com/metrics/explainer_drift\"}], \"sources\": [\"S2\", \"S3\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 0.15, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"TVD\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "Total variation distance = 0.5 × sum of absolute differences in category proportions between current and reference prompts. Freeze the same intent/language taxonomy and include an unknown category. Denominator: prompts with a recorded category.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Re-score a matched sample, examine labels and group failures by release, task and language.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-TASK_SUCCESS",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Task success rate",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting task success rate goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Use the last compatible release only after a repeated quality breach is attributable to a change and the candidate passes the same eval set.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "task_success",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"lt\", \"definition\": \"100 \\u00d7 evaluated completed tasks that pass the fixed task rubric / all eligible completed tasks evaluated. Record unscored and pending labels separately.\", \"id\": \"task_success\", \"max\": 100, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Task success rate\", \"rationale\": \"Business outcomes can change while input distributions remain stable.\", \"response\": \"Re-score a matched sample, examine labels and group failures by release, task and language.\", \"rollback\": \"Use the last compatible release only after a repeated quality breach is attributable to a change and the candidate passes the same eval set.\", \"sampleClass\": \"evaluated\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S2\", \"url\": \"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/gen-ai-lifecycle-operational-excellence/prod-monitoring-drift.html\"}, {\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S6\", \"url\": \"https://docs.evidentlyai.com/docs/platform/monitoring_overview\"}], \"sources\": [\"S2\", \"S6\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 90, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"%\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "100 × evaluated completed tasks that pass the fixed task rubric / all eligible completed tasks evaluated. Record unscored and pending labels separately.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Review benign refusals with a stable labeling rubric before changing guardrails.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-REFUSAL",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Benign-request refusal rate",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting benign-request refusal rate goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Revert an implicated policy or prompt change only after both benign-helpfulness and unsafe-request tests pass.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "refusal",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"gt\", \"definition\": \"100 \\u00d7 refused requests judged answerable and allowed / evaluated requests judged answerable and allowed. Exclude unsafe prompts from this denominator and monitor unsafe acceptance separately.\", \"id\": \"refusal\", \"max\": 100, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Benign-request refusal rate\", \"rationale\": \"A rise may indicate a policy or prompt regression. An appropriate safety refusal is not a failure.\", \"response\": \"Review benign refusals with a stable labeling rubric before changing guardrails.\", \"rollback\": \"Revert an implicated policy or prompt change only after both benign-helpfulness and unsafe-request tests pass.\", \"sampleClass\": \"evaluated\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S2\", \"url\": \"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/gen-ai-lifecycle-operational-excellence/prod-monitoring-drift.html\"}, {\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S6\", \"url\": \"https://docs.evidentlyai.com/docs/platform/monitoring_overview\"}], \"sources\": [\"S2\", \"S6\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 10, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"%\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "100 × refused requests judged answerable and allowed / evaluated requests judged answerable and allowed. Exclude unsafe prompts from this denominator and monitor unsafe acceptance separately.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Compare first-attempt and final outputs separately. Inspect schema and model versions.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-SCHEMA",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Schema conformance",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting schema conformance goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Revert the implicated model, prompt or schema change if the prior compatible bundle restores validation without violating current requirements.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "schema",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"lt\", \"definition\": \"100 \\u00d7 outputs passing the versioned required schema / requests that require that schema. Include missing, truncated and unparsable outputs as failures. Track endpoint errors separately.\", \"id\": \"schema\", \"max\": 100, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Schema conformance\", \"rationale\": \"Successful HTTP responses can still break downstream consumers.\", \"response\": \"Compare first-attempt and final outputs separately. Inspect schema and model versions.\", \"rollback\": \"Revert the implicated model, prompt or schema change if the prior compatible bundle restores validation without violating current requirements.\", \"sampleClass\": \"requests\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}, {\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S6\", \"url\": \"https://docs.evidentlyai.com/docs/platform/monitoring_overview\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\", \"S6\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 99, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"%\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "100 × outputs passing the versioned required schema / requests that require that schema. Include missing, truncated and unparsable outputs as failures. Track endpoint errors separately.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Inspect queue time, retrieval, retries and model spans. Compare like-for-like workload slices.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-LATENCY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "End-to-end p95 latency",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting end-to-end p95 latency goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "If a canary release causes an SLO breach, route to a compatible known-good path. Check quality and capacity before expanding traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "latency",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"gt\", \"definition\": \"95th percentile of end-to-end completed request durations, measured from application receipt to terminal response. Record timeouts/cancellations separately. Do not average per-host percentiles.\", \"id\": \"latency\", \"max\": 3600000, \"min\": 1, \"name\": \"End-to-end p95 latency\", \"rationale\": \"A quality-preserving release can still exceed the user-facing latency budget.\", \"response\": \"Inspect queue time, retrieval, retries and model spans. Compare like-for-like workload slices.\", \"rollback\": \"If a canary release causes an SLO breach, route to a compatible known-good path. Check quality and capacity before expanding traffic.\", \"sampleClass\": \"requests\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S5\", \"url\": \"https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai/tree/b5d8440f6f126738fd50f927752cd669772c517b/docs/gen-ai\"}], \"sources\": [\"S5\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 2500, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"ms\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "95th percentile of end-to-end completed request durations, measured from application receipt to terminal response. Record timeouts/cancellations separately. Do not average per-host percentiles.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Inspect source validity, chunk boundaries and retrieval versions. Sample judge disagreements for human review.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-GROUNDING",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Grounded-claim rate",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting grounded-claim rate goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Revert the corpus, retriever or prompt only if a replay isolates that component and the restored corpus remains valid and authorized.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "grounding",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"lt\", \"definition\": \"100 \\u00d7 checkable claims supported by retrieved evidence / all checkable claims in evaluated answers. Judge the cited passage, not the mere presence of a citation. Track answers with no checkable claims separately.\", \"id\": \"grounding\", \"max\": 100, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Grounded-claim rate\", \"rationale\": \"The fraction measures evidence support under a rubric, not universal factual accuracy.\", \"response\": \"Inspect source validity, chunk boundaries and retrieval versions. Sample judge disagreements for human review.\", \"rollback\": \"Revert the corpus, retriever or prompt only if a replay isolates that component and the restored corpus remains valid and authorized.\", \"sampleClass\": \"evaluated\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}, {\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S6\", \"url\": \"https://docs.evidentlyai.com/docs/platform/monitoring_overview\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\", \"S6\"], \"systems\": [\"rag\"], \"threshold\": 90, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"%\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "100 × checkable claims supported by retrieved evidence / all checkable claims in evaluated answers. Judge the cited passage, not the mere presence of a citation. Track answers with no checkable claims separately.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Separate missing source documents from retriever/reranker failures. Rerun against the previous index.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-RECALL",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Retrieval recall@k",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting retrieval recall@k goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Restore a compatible index or retriever only after the same relevance set improves and required document updates remain available.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "recall",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"lt\", \"definition\": \"Mean per-query percentage of labeled relevant documents found within the top k results, on the versioned retrieval evaluation set. Freeze k and relevance labels. Exclude queries without labeled relevant documents and report their count.\", \"id\": \"recall\", \"max\": 100, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Retrieval recall@k\", \"rationale\": \"A current corpus can still miss the document needed to answer the question.\", \"response\": \"Separate missing source documents from retriever/reranker failures. Rerun against the previous index.\", \"rollback\": \"Restore a compatible index or retriever only after the same relevance set improves and required document updates remain available.\", \"sampleClass\": \"evaluated\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}, {\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S6\", \"url\": \"https://docs.evidentlyai.com/docs/platform/monitoring_overview\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\", \"S6\"], \"systems\": [\"rag\"], \"threshold\": 80, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"%\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "Mean per-query percentage of labeled relevant documents found within the top k results, on the versioned retrieval evaluation set. Freeze k and relevance labels. Exclude queries without labeled relevant documents and report their count.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Inspect failed ingestion, change feeds, index jobs and outstanding deletions. Identify affected sources.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-FRESHNESS",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Corpus update lag",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting corpus update lag goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Pause answers from affected sources or use a reviewed fallback. Never restore revoked, deleted or unauthorized documents to improve a metric.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "freshness",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"gt\", \"definition\": \"Maximum elapsed time from an authoritative source revision to the matching revision becoming queryable. Include outstanding updates using current time. Measure deletion propagation separately.\", \"id\": \"freshness\", \"max\": 8760, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Corpus update lag\", \"rationale\": \"An ingestion backlog can make grounded answers obsolete even when the model has not changed.\", \"response\": \"Inspect failed ingestion, change feeds, index jobs and outstanding deletions. Identify affected sources.\", \"rollback\": \"Pause answers from affected sources or use a reviewed fallback. Never restore revoked, deleted or unauthorized documents to improve a metric.\", \"sampleClass\": \"event\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\"], \"systems\": [\"rag\"], \"threshold\": 24, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"hours\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "Maximum elapsed time from an authoritative source revision to the matching revision becoming queryable. Include outstanding updates using current time. Measure deletion propagation separately.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Stop promotion and compare active hashes with the approved prompt registry.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-PROMPT_CHANGES",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Unreviewed prompt releases",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting unreviewed prompt releases goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Restore the approved compatible prompt only after verifying tool permissions, model and schema compatibility. This event bypasses sample and persistence gates.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "prompt_changes",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"gt\", \"definition\": \"Count of active prompt-template hashes that lack a successful regression evaluation and an approved release record. Prompt entropy here means uncontrolled template changes, not a Shannon entropy metric.\", \"id\": \"prompt_changes\", \"max\": 0, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Unreviewed prompt releases\", \"rationale\": \"Without a release record, changed behavior cannot be attributed or reproduced.\", \"response\": \"Stop promotion and compare active hashes with the approved prompt registry.\", \"rollback\": \"Restore the approved compatible prompt only after verifying tool permissions, model and schema compatibility. This event bypasses sample and persistence gates.\", \"sampleClass\": \"event\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 0, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"releases\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "Count of active prompt-template hashes that lack a successful regression evaluation and an approved release record. Prompt entropy here means uncontrolled template changes, not a Shannon entropy metric.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Verify the provider notice and rehearse the replacement against the current eval set.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-MODEL_LIFECYCLE",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Provider sunset lead time",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting provider sunset lead time goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Use a supported pre-evaluated fallback if the snapshot becomes unavailable. Do not roll back to a retired model. Check daily and on notices. No sample gate.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "model_lifecycle",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"lt\", \"definition\": \"Days remaining until the provider-published retirement date for the exact deployed model snapshot. Unknown retirement dates are unknown, never zero or safe.\", \"id\": \"model_lifecycle\", \"max\": 365, \"min\": 1, \"name\": \"Provider sunset lead time\", \"rationale\": \"A scheduled model retirement requires a tested migration path. It is a lifecycle event rather than a statistical drift score.\", \"response\": \"Verify the provider notice and rehearse the replacement against the current eval set.\", \"rollback\": \"Use a supported pre-evaluated fallback if the snapshot becomes unavailable. Do not roll back to a retired model. Check daily and on notices. No sample gate.\", \"sampleClass\": \"event\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\"], \"systems\": [\"chat\", \"rag\", \"agent\"], \"threshold\": 30, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"days\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "Days remaining until the provider-published retirement date for the exact deployed model snapshot. Unknown retirement dates are unknown, never zero or safe.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Disable the affected write capability, preserve evidence and assess compensation for completed effects.",
        "change_trigger": "Review when the model, prompt, data, tools, traffic mix, metric definition or local error budget changes.",
        "config": "drift",
        "control_id": "DRIFT-TOOL_POLICY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned metric definition and baseline",
          "Measured observations with sampling window and denominator",
          "Response and recovery exercise record"
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/verification/rollback: source; risk/boundary/evidence/owner/trigger: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release.",
          "Source thresholds are illustrative; calibrate locally. This catalog does not evaluate live telemetry."
        ],
        "name": "Unauthorized tool effects",
        "owner_role": "Monitoring owner with the affected component owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A change affecting unauthorized tool effects goes undetected or receives an inappropriate response.",
        "rollback": "Switch to a read-only or human-mediated path. Deployment rollback does not undo payments, messages or other external effects. Bypass sample and persistence gates.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:30588884b6d39f24b3dbdd929b221d3bd27d936d2eb6a334c3039ded119dcf6a",
        "source_native_id": "tool_policy",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"comparator\": \"gt\", \"definition\": \"Count of observed tool side effects outside the allowed action, resource or approval scope. Log denied attempts separately. This signal concerns effects that occurred.\", \"id\": \"tool_policy\", \"max\": 0, \"min\": 0, \"name\": \"Unauthorized tool effects\", \"rationale\": \"A single confirmed unauthorized effect requires incident handling regardless of traffic.\", \"response\": \"Disable the affected write capability, preserve evidence and assess compensation for completed effects.\", \"rollback\": \"Switch to a read-only or human-mediated path. Deployment rollback does not undo payments, messages or other external effects. Bypass sample and persistence gates.\", \"sampleClass\": \"event\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"checked\": \"2026-09-08\", \"id\": \"S1\", \"url\": \"https://pharosproduction.com/insights/engineering/state-of-production-ai-engineering-2026/\"}], \"sources\": [\"S1\"], \"systems\": [\"agent\"], \"threshold\": 0, \"thresholdBasis\": \"Illustrative setting. Calibrate against local baseline and error budget.\", \"unit\": \"effects\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/production-ai-drift-planner/blob/f2938cfb84bbe09c5eab4f95dd404f1ca67c39ae/docs/data/metrics.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Selected production AI system, versioned evaluation cohort and monitoring window.",
        "verification": "Count of observed tool side effects outside the allowed action, resource or approval scope. Log denied attempts separately. This signal concerns effects that occurred.",
        "verified_at": null
      }
    ],
    "governance": [
      {
        "action": "Give the system a stable identity before assessing it. Include models, retrieval data, prompts, tools and the environments where people use them.",
        "change_trigger": "A model, prompt, dataset, tool, purpose or environment changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-INVENTORY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned register entry with intended purpose, model/provider identifiers, data sources, deployment location and review triggers."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "AI system inventory",
        "owner_role": "Product owner; accountable role: System owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Unregistered components invalidate a release decision.",
        "rollback": "Pause promotion until the register matches the actual release; restore only a documented compatible bundle.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "inventory",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Confirm system scope and the organization's role.\", \"evidence\": \"Versioned register entry with intended purpose, model/provider identifiers, data sources, deployment location and review triggers.\", \"function\": \"MAP\", \"id\": \"inventory\", \"purpose\": \"Give the system a stable identity before assessing it. Include models, retrieval data, prompts, tools and the environments where people use them.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Map\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/map/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"System owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Product owner\", \"title\": \"AI system inventory\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Record who is affected, where outputs are used and which decisions the system can influence. Assign an explicit reviewer to the scope decision.",
        "change_trigger": "Intended use, geography, affected population or decision impact changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-SCOPE",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Dated scoping memo with intended use, affected groups, deployment geography, legal questions and unresolved assumptions."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Jurisdiction and use-case review",
        "owner_role": "Legal/compliance lead; accountable role: Business owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A use or affected population falls outside the reviewed scope.",
        "rollback": "Suspend the expanded use and return to the previously reviewed scope while the assigned reviewer resolves open questions.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "scope",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Check territorial scope, classification and applicable transition rules.\", \"evidence\": \"Dated scoping memo with intended use, affected groups, deployment geography, legal questions and unresolved assumptions.\", \"function\": \"MAP\", \"id\": \"scope\", \"purpose\": \"Record who is affected, where outputs are used and which decisions the system can influence. Assign an explicit reviewer to the scope decision.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Map\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/map/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Business owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Legal/compliance lead\", \"title\": \"Jurisdiction and use-case review\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Describe a plausible failure and its consequence for each affected group. Keep open risks visible with the acceptance authority and a review trigger.",
        "change_trigger": "A new failure scenario, incident, mitigation change or residual-risk decision appears.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-RISK",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Risk register containing failure scenarios, impact analysis, mitigation owners, residual risk decisions and change triggers."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Risk register and acceptance",
        "owner_role": "Risk analyst; accountable role: Risk owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A known failure is accepted without a current owner or authority.",
        "rollback": "Pause the exposed use case and reopen its risk decision; preserve objections and obtain an explicit acceptance or mitigation decision.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "risk",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review prohibited practices and any high-risk classification.\", \"evidence\": \"Risk register containing failure scenarios, impact analysis, mitigation owners, residual risk decisions and change triggers.\", \"function\": \"MAP\", \"id\": \"risk\", \"purpose\": \"Describe a plausible failure and its consequence for each affected group. Keep open risks visible with the acceptance authority and a review trigger.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Map\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/map/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Risk owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Risk analyst\", \"title\": \"Risk register and acceptance\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Name the person who performs the control and the person who accepts its outcome. Record consulted specialists and the people who receive the decision.",
        "change_trigger": "People, delegation, escalation or release authority changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-ACCOUNTABILITY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "RACI record plus a release decision log that names risk acceptance authority, escalation route and unresolved objections."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Accountability and decision authority",
        "owner_role": "Governance lead; accountable role: Executive sponsor",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Release or incident decisions have no accountable person.",
        "rollback": "Pause decisions that require the missing authority and route them to the documented accountable replacement.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "accountability",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Confirm provider/deployer responsibilities for the particular system.\", \"evidence\": \"RACI record plus a release decision log that names risk acceptance authority, escalation route and unresolved objections.\", \"function\": \"GOVERN\", \"id\": \"accountability\", \"purpose\": \"Name the person who performs the control and the person who accepts its outcome. Record consulted specialists and the people who receive the decision.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Govern\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/govern/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Executive sponsor\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Governance lead\", \"title\": \"Accountability and decision authority\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Make training fit the decisions each role actually makes. Operators should rehearse escalation and understand where the system can fail.",
        "change_trigger": "A role, workflow, limitation or escalation procedure changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-LITERACY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Training record with role, relevant system limitations, completed exercises, attendance and a refresher trigger."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Role-specific training",
        "owner_role": "Training lead; accountable role: System owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Operators cannot recognize or contain a known failure.",
        "rollback": "Restrict affected operations to a trained supervisor until the role-specific exercise is completed.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "literacy",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review AI literacy obligations and operator competence.\", \"evidence\": \"Training record with role, relevant system limitations, completed exercises, attendance and a refresher trigger.\", \"function\": \"GOVERN\", \"id\": \"literacy\", \"purpose\": \"Make training fit the decisions each role actually makes. Operators should rehearse escalation and understand where the system can fail.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Govern\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/govern/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"System owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Training lead\", \"title\": \"Role-specific training\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Record which externally supplied components can change behavior. Include access, version changes and the evidence a provider makes available.",
        "change_trigger": "Supplier terms, supported versions, access, hosting or component ownership changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-SUPPLIER",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Dependency register, supplier instructions, version policy, data-use terms, exit plan and a named owner for vendor changes."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Supplier and model dependencies",
        "owner_role": "Vendor manager; accountable role: System owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A supplier change breaks the operating or evidence boundary.",
        "rollback": "Disable the affected integration or move to a reviewed supported fallback; do not restore a retired or revoked dependency.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "supplier",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Check upstream model information and downstream responsibilities.\", \"evidence\": \"Dependency register, supplier instructions, version policy, data-use terms, exit plan and a named owner for vendor changes.\", \"function\": \"GOVERN\", \"id\": \"supplier\", \"purpose\": \"Record which externally supplied components can change behavior. Include access, version changes and the evidence a provider makes available.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Govern\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/govern/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"System owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Vendor manager\", \"title\": \"Supplier and model dependencies\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Trace evaluation and retrieval data to a permitted source. Record sensitive fields, access rules and deletion or correction paths.",
        "change_trigger": "Sources, permissions, retention, population coverage or correction requests change.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-DATA",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Data lineage record with allowed uses, quality checks, retention decision, access test and affected population coverage."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Data provenance and access",
        "owner_role": "Data lead; accountable role: Data owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Data is used outside its permitted scope or retained after revocation.",
        "rollback": "Remove access to the affected data and rebuild a permitted snapshot; never restore revoked data to improve quality metrics.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "data",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review data governance and separate privacy obligations.\", \"evidence\": \"Data lineage record with allowed uses, quality checks, retention decision, access test and affected population coverage.\", \"function\": \"MAP\", \"id\": \"data\", \"purpose\": \"Trace evaluation and retrieval data to a permitted source. Record sensitive fields, access rules and deletion or correction paths.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Map\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/map/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Data owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Data lead\", \"title\": \"Data provenance and access\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Test the intended use and credible misuse before release. Record subgroup limitations, security failures and the reason for each acceptance threshold.",
        "change_trigger": "The release, rubric, evaluation set, threat model or acceptance threshold changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-VALIDATION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned evaluation set, rubric, measured results, security tests, known limitations and an accepted release decision."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Validation and failure testing",
        "owner_role": "Evaluation lead; accountable role: Release owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A release is promoted without evidence for its intended use.",
        "rollback": "Stop promotion and rerun the same relevant evaluation against a compatible known-good candidate before routing traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "validation",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity and supporting documentation.\", \"evidence\": \"Versioned evaluation set, rubric, measured results, security tests, known limitations and an accepted release decision.\", \"function\": \"MEASURE\", \"id\": \"validation\", \"purpose\": \"Test the intended use and credible misuse before release. Record subgroup limitations, security failures and the reason for each acceptance threshold.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Measure\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/measure/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Release owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Evaluation lead\", \"title\": \"Validation and failure testing\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Test whether an operator can understand a warning, override an action and stop the workflow. Check what users are told about AI involvement.",
        "change_trigger": "The interface, action authority, notices or operator workflow changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-OVERSIGHT",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Observed override exercise, authority boundaries, user instructions, escalation path and accessible notices for the intended audience."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Human oversight and user information",
        "owner_role": "Product/security lead; accountable role: System owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A human cannot understand, override or stop the workflow.",
        "rollback": "Disable autonomous action and route affected cases through an accountable human until override and stop exercises pass.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "oversight",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review oversight measures and relevant transparency duties.\", \"evidence\": \"Observed override exercise, authority boundaries, user instructions, escalation path and accessible notices for the intended audience.\", \"function\": \"MEASURE\", \"id\": \"oversight\", \"purpose\": \"Test whether an operator can understand a warning, override an action and stop the workflow. Check what users are told about AI involvement.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Measure\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/measure/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"System owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Product/security lead\", \"title\": \"Human oversight and user information\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Keep enough context to reconstruct a decision without indiscriminately retaining sensitive payloads. Tie approvals and changes to an identifiable release.",
        "change_trigger": "Trace schema, approval linkage, storage, access or retention policy changes.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-RECORDS",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Redacted trace sample, version/approval identifiers, retention/access rules and a tested path for retrieving a decision record."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Traceability and change records",
        "owner_role": "Platform lead; accountable role: System owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A material decision cannot be reconstructed within the retention policy.",
        "rollback": "Pause affected high-impact decisions while restoring the permitted trace path; preserve existing records without expanding sensitive-data retention by default.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "records",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review logging and technical documentation requirements.\", \"evidence\": \"Redacted trace sample, version/approval identifiers, retention/access rules and a tested path for retrieving a decision record.\", \"function\": \"GOVERN\", \"id\": \"records\", \"purpose\": \"Keep enough context to reconstruct a decision without indiscriminately retaining sensitive payloads. Tie approvals and changes to an identifiable release.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Govern\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/govern/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"System owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Platform lead\", \"title\": \"Traceability and change records\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Connect a measured signal to a response owner. Review thresholds against an evaluation baseline and test the recovery path after a breach.",
        "change_trigger": "Signals, thresholds, alert routing, baseline or recovery targets change.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-MONITORING",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Monitoring specification, baseline reference, alert routing, response exercise, rollback target and post-change review record."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Monitoring and response ownership",
        "owner_role": "Operations lead; accountable role: Service owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A measured breach receives no owned or tested response.",
        "rollback": "Contain the affected capability and rehearse the compatible recovery path; investigate the breach before expanding traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "monitoring",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Review post-market monitoring and deployer monitoring duties.\", \"evidence\": \"Monitoring specification, baseline reference, alert routing, response exercise, rollback target and post-change review record.\", \"function\": \"MANAGE\", \"id\": \"monitoring\", \"purpose\": \"Connect a measured signal to a response owner. Review thresholds against an evaluation baseline and test the recovery path after a breach.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Manage\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/manage/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Service owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Operations lead\", \"title\": \"Monitoring and response ownership\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Rehearse how an issue becomes an incident, who contains it and who decides whether notification is required. Preserve the incident timeline.",
        "change_trigger": "Severity criteria, incident contacts, workflows or applicable notification requirements change.",
        "config": "governance",
        "control_id": "GOV-INCIDENT",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Incident playbook and exercise record with severity criteria, containment authority, notification review, recipients and applicable clocks."
        ],
        "field_origin": "name/action/evidence/roles: source; remaining normalized fields: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Incident triage and notification",
        "owner_role": "Incident commander; accountable role: Accountable incident owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Containment or notification review is delayed by unclear responsibility.",
        "rollback": "Invoke the containment authority and preserve the timeline; route notification decisions to the named qualified reviewer.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:d9f23d92f28c6f59b3db325b2a95257c247847c23d774baf7d154608176fcff6",
        "source_native_id": "incident",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"euReview\": \"Confirm reportability, recipient and deadline for the specific regime.\", \"evidence\": \"Incident playbook and exercise record with severity criteria, containment authority, notification review, recipients and applicable clocks.\", \"function\": \"MANAGE\", \"id\": \"incident\", \"purpose\": \"Rehearse how an issue becomes an incident, who contains it and who decides whether notification is required. Preserve the incident timeline.\", \"sourceReferences\": [{\"label\": \"NIST AI RMF Playbook: Manage\", \"url\": \"https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/playbook/manage/\"}, {\"label\": \"European Commission: AI Act overview\", \"url\": \"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai\"}], \"suggestedAccountable\": \"Accountable incident owner\", \"suggestedResponsible\": \"Incident commander\", \"title\": \"Incident triage and notification\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/ai-governance-readiness-map/blob/2691dacd9318e15aa97a6bb6cb2a89327f773228/docs/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "The named AI system, intended use, affected people and operating organization.",
        "verification": "Inspect the dated record, scope and named decision owner; exercise the documented procedure where applicable.",
        "verified_at": null
      }
    ],
    "security": [
      {
        "action": "Issue a distinct workload identity per agent role and environment; bind delegated user context separately and reject anonymous production tool calls.",
        "change_trigger": "Unique workload identity: review on identity, audience, token lifetime, tenant binding or authorization policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-IDENTITY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Identity inventory with environment and owner",
          "Denied and allowed authorization decision records"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Unique workload identity",
        "owner_role": "Identity platform owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unintended principal obtains another identity or scope.",
        "rollback": "Revoke affected credentials, deny the affected capability and restore a reviewed compatible authorization policy; verify tenant isolation before reopening access.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-IDENTITY",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C02\", \"C12\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Identity inventory with environment and owner\", \"Denied and allowed authorization decision records\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-IDENTITY\", \"implementation\": \"Issue a distinct workload identity per agent role and environment; bind delegated user context separately and reject anonymous production tool calls.\", \"layerId\": \"identity-access\", \"name\": \"Unique workload identity\", \"objective\": \"Give each agent runtime and service hop an attributable non-human identity instead of a shared account.\", \"order\": 1, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S06\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.4.1\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Identity platform owner\", \"verification\": \"Attempt a production-like tool call with no workload identity, a sibling identity and the intended identity; confirm only the intended identity succeeds and each decision is attributable.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Attempt a production-like tool call with no workload identity, a sibling identity and the intended identity; confirm only the intended identity succeeds and each decision is attributable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Mint short-lived tokens for the intended resource server and minimum operation; validate issuer, audience and expiry; prohibit token passthrough and keep revocation available.",
        "change_trigger": "Short-lived audience-bound credentials: review on identity, audience, token lifetime, tenant binding or authorization policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-SCOPED-TOKENS",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Token policy showing lifetime, audience and scopes",
          "Negative authorization test results",
          "Credential revocation procedure"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Short-lived audience-bound credentials",
        "owner_role": "Identity and access engineer",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unintended principal obtains another identity or scope.",
        "rollback": "Revoke affected credentials, deny the affected capability and restore a reviewed compatible authorization policy; verify tenant isolation before reopening access.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-SCOPED-TOKENS",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C04\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Token policy showing lifetime, audience and scopes\", \"Negative authorization test results\", \"Credential revocation procedure\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-SCOPED-TOKENS\", \"implementation\": \"Mint short-lived tokens for the intended resource server and minimum operation; validate issuer, audience and expiry; prohibit token passthrough and keep revocation available.\", \"layerId\": \"identity-access\", \"name\": \"Short-lived audience-bound credentials\", \"objective\": \"Limit credential reuse by constraining lifetime, audience and scope to the exact resource operation.\", \"order\": 2, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S05\", \"S06\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C5.1.2\", \"C9.4.3\", \"C10.2.7\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Identity and access engineer\", \"verification\": \"Replay expired, wrong-audience, over-scoped and forwarded tokens against the resource boundary and confirm fail-closed rejection without downstream forwarding.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Replay expired, wrong-audience, over-scoped and forwarded tokens against the resource boundary and confirm fail-closed rejection without downstream forwarding.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Evaluate subject, tenant, tool, operation, arguments, resource, user delegation and current policy in a deterministic enforcement service before every privileged call.",
        "change_trigger": "Deterministic policy decision point: review on identity, audience, token lifetime, tenant binding or authorization policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-POLICY-DECISION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned authorization policy",
          "Policy decision test suite",
          "Decision log samples with policy version"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Deterministic policy decision point",
        "owner_role": "Authorization service owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unintended principal obtains another identity or scope.",
        "rollback": "Revoke affected credentials, deny the affected capability and restore a reviewed compatible authorization policy; verify tenant isolation before reopening access.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-POLICY-DECISION",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C03\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Versioned authorization policy\", \"Policy decision test suite\", \"Decision log samples with policy version\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-POLICY-DECISION\", \"implementation\": \"Evaluate subject, tenant, tool, operation, arguments, resource, user delegation and current policy in a deterministic enforcement service before every privileged call.\", \"layerId\": \"identity-access\", \"name\": \"Deterministic policy decision point\", \"objective\": \"Keep permission decisions outside probabilistic model output.\", \"order\": 3, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S05\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C5.2.5\", \"C9.5.3\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Authorization service owner\", \"verification\": \"Submit model requests that ask to bypass policy, change arguments after approval or use an unauthorized resource; confirm the enforcement point denies each call.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Submit model requests that ask to bypass policy, change arguments after approval or use an unauthorized resource; confirm the enforcement point denies each call.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Carry an immutable tenant identifier from authenticated request through retrieval, memory, policy and tool calls; separate tenant keys and deny missing or conflicting scope.",
        "change_trigger": "Tenant-bound authorization context: review on identity, audience, token lifetime, tenant binding or authorization policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-TENANT-BOUNDARY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Tenant data-flow diagram",
          "Cross-tenant isolation test report",
          "Tenant-scoped key and policy inventory"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Tenant-bound authorization context",
        "owner_role": "Application security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unintended principal obtains another identity or scope.",
        "rollback": "Revoke affected credentials, deny the affected capability and restore a reviewed compatible authorization policy; verify tenant isolation before reopening access.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-TENANT-BOUNDARY",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C02\", \"C12\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Tenant data-flow diagram\", \"Cross-tenant isolation test report\", \"Tenant-scoped key and policy inventory\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\", \"contain\"], \"id\": \"CTL-TENANT-BOUNDARY\", \"implementation\": \"Carry an immutable tenant identifier from authenticated request through retrieval, memory, policy and tool calls; separate tenant keys and deny missing or conflicting scope.\", \"layerId\": \"identity-access\", \"name\": \"Tenant-bound authorization context\", \"objective\": \"Prevent shared agent infrastructure from resolving data, memory or tools outside the active tenant.\", \"order\": 4, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S04\", \"S06\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C8.1.3\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Application security owner\", \"verification\": \"Run cross-tenant negative tests for retrieval, cache, memory and tool resources, including forged and absent tenant identifiers; confirm denial and alerting.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Run cross-tenant negative tests for retrieval, cache, memory and tool resources, including forged and absent tenant identifiers; confirm denial and alerting.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Normalize supported encodings, retain source metadata, label external data as untrusted, classify sensitive fields and minimize or redact them before model context, memory, logs and tool calls; preserve trust labels across later boundaries.",
        "change_trigger": "Content trust, classification and minimization: review on prompt hierarchy, content source, parser, output schema or isolation boundary changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-CONTENT-TRUST",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Input trust and data-classification taxonomy",
          "Normalization and sensitive-field redaction corpus results",
          "End-to-end provenance and data-minimization trace"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Content trust, classification and minimization",
        "owner_role": "AI application engineer",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Untrusted content crosses an instruction or data boundary.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine the affected input path and restore a compatible reviewed prompt/parser boundary; recheck legitimate and adversarial inputs before routing traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-CONTENT-TRUST",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C01\", \"C02\", \"C19\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Input trust and data-classification taxonomy\", \"Normalization and sensitive-field redaction corpus results\", \"End-to-end provenance and data-minimization trace\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-CONTENT-TRUST\", \"implementation\": \"Normalize supported encodings, retain source metadata, label external data as untrusted, classify sensitive fields and minimize or redact them before model context, memory, logs and tool calls; preserve trust labels across later boundaries.\", \"layerId\": \"input-instruction\", \"name\": \"Content trust, classification and minimization\", \"objective\": \"Preserve origin and trust while classifying, minimizing and redacting sensitive fields before content reaches model context, memory, logs or tools.\", \"order\": 1, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S09\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C2.1.1\", \"C2.1.2\", \"C9.3.7\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"AI application engineer\", \"verification\": \"Feed encoded, nested and relayed content containing seeded sensitive fields through every ingestion and propagation path; confirm normalization, classification and trust labels persist while disallowed fields are absent from model context, memory, logs and tool payloads.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Feed encoded, nested and relayed content containing seeded sensitive fields through every ingestion and propagation path; confirm normalization, classification and trust labels persist while disallowed fields are absent from model context, memory, logs and tool payloads.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Represent system policy, user intent and untrusted data in separate fields; delimit external content; refuse instructions originating from data fields and test conflict handling.",
        "change_trigger": "Instruction and data separation: review on prompt hierarchy, content source, parser, output schema or isolation boundary changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-INSTRUCTION-HIERARCHY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Prompt and message-boundary specification",
          "Injection evaluation results",
          "Documented conflict-handling behavior"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Instruction and data separation",
        "owner_role": "AI application security engineer",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Untrusted content crosses an instruction or data boundary.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine the affected input path and restore a compatible reviewed prompt/parser boundary; recheck legitimate and adversarial inputs before routing traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-INSTRUCTION-HIERARCHY",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C01\", \"C15\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Prompt and message-boundary specification\", \"Injection evaluation results\", \"Documented conflict-handling behavior\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-INSTRUCTION-HIERARCHY\", \"implementation\": \"Represent system policy, user intent and untrusted data in separate fields; delimit external content; refuse instructions originating from data fields and test conflict handling.\", \"layerId\": \"input-instruction\", \"name\": \"Instruction and data separation\", \"objective\": \"Prevent retrieved or tool-returned content from silently acquiring system-level authority.\", \"order\": 2, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S02\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S09\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C2.1.3\", \"C2.1.6\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"AI application security engineer\", \"verification\": \"Use direct and indirect injection cases that conflict with system and user intent; confirm external text cannot alter policy or authorize a capability.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Use direct and indirect injection cases that conflict with system and user intent; confirm external text cannot alter policy or authorize a capability.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Define strict schemas for tool arguments, tool results and agent messages; reject unknown fields, invalid types, oversized values and instructions in data-only fields.",
        "change_trigger": "Schema-bound boundary output: review on prompt hierarchy, content source, parser, output schema or isolation boundary changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-OUTPUT-SCHEMA",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned boundary schemas",
          "Schema fuzz-test report",
          "Rejected-payload telemetry sample"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Schema-bound boundary output",
        "owner_role": "Platform API owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Untrusted content crosses an instruction or data boundary.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine the affected input path and restore a compatible reviewed prompt/parser boundary; recheck legitimate and adversarial inputs before routing traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-OUTPUT-SCHEMA",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C02\", \"C03\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Versioned boundary schemas\", \"Schema fuzz-test report\", \"Rejected-payload telemetry sample\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-OUTPUT-SCHEMA\", \"implementation\": \"Define strict schemas for tool arguments, tool results and agent messages; reject unknown fields, invalid types, oversized values and instructions in data-only fields.\", \"layerId\": \"input-instruction\", \"name\": \"Schema-bound boundary output\", \"objective\": \"Reject free-form model or tool output before it becomes executable input to another component.\", \"order\": 3, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.3.2\", \"C10.4.1\", \"C10.4.2\", \"C10.4.3\", \"C10.4.4\", \"C10.4.5\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Platform API owner\", \"verification\": \"Fuzz each schema with extra fields, type confusion, oversized payloads and instruction-bearing strings; confirm invalid records never reach an execution boundary.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Fuzz each schema with extra fields, type confusion, oversized payloads and instruction-bearing strings; confirm invalid records never reach an execution boundary.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Process untrusted content in a tool-free or separately privileged stage and pass only a validated structured result into an action-capable stage.",
        "change_trigger": "Untrusted-content processing isolation: review on prompt hierarchy, content source, parser, output schema or isolation boundary changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-UNTRUSTED-ISOLATION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Trust-boundary architecture diagram",
          "Capability inventory for ingestion stage",
          "Injection-to-tool negative test"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Untrusted-content processing isolation",
        "owner_role": "AI platform architect",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Untrusted content crosses an instruction or data boundary.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine the affected input path and restore a compatible reviewed prompt/parser boundary; recheck legitimate and adversarial inputs before routing traffic.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-UNTRUSTED-ISOLATION",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C01\", \"C02\", \"C03\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Trust-boundary architecture diagram\", \"Capability inventory for ingestion stage\", \"Injection-to-tool negative test\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"contain\"], \"id\": \"CTL-UNTRUSTED-ISOLATION\", \"implementation\": \"Process untrusted content in a tool-free or separately privileged stage and pass only a validated structured result into an action-capable stage.\", \"layerId\": \"input-instruction\", \"name\": \"Untrusted-content processing isolation\", \"objective\": \"Break the direct path from untrusted interpretation to privileged tool execution.\", \"order\": 4, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.3.5\", \"C9.3.6\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"AI platform architect\", \"verification\": \"Inject tool-call instructions into every external source and confirm the content-processing stage has no credential, tool or egress path capable of carrying them out.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Inject tool-call instructions into every external source and confirm the content-processing stage has no credential, tool or egress path capable of carrying them out.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Resolve an allowlisted tool manifest, validate arguments, bind user and workload context and make a fresh deterministic policy decision for every invocation.",
        "change_trigger": "Per-invocation tool authorization: review on tool arguments, permissions, sandbox, network destinations or retry semantics change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-TOOL-AUTH",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Tool manifest and permission matrix",
          "Per-invocation denial tests",
          "Authorization decision trace"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Per-invocation tool authorization",
        "owner_role": "Tool gateway owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A tool action exceeds its authorized scope or creates duplicate external effects.",
        "rollback": "Disable the affected write or execution capability. Restore a compatible restricted route after replay checks; separately assess compensation for completed external effects.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-TOOL-AUTH",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C03\", \"C05\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Tool manifest and permission matrix\", \"Per-invocation denial tests\", \"Authorization decision trace\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-TOOL-AUTH\", \"implementation\": \"Resolve an allowlisted tool manifest, validate arguments, bind user and workload context and make a fresh deterministic policy decision for every invocation.\", \"layerId\": \"tool-execution\", \"name\": \"Per-invocation tool authorization\", \"objective\": \"Authorize the exact tool, operation and arguments at the moment of use.\", \"order\": 1, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S05\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.5.1\", \"C10.2.4\", \"C10.2.5\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Tool gateway owner\", \"verification\": \"Try unauthorized tools, substituted arguments, stale approvals and calls outside delegated user scope; confirm each is denied before side effects.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Try unauthorized tools, substituted arguments, stale approvals and calls outside delegated user scope; confirm each is denied before side effects.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Run code in an ephemeral least-privilege sandbox with no inherited credentials, read-only base image, bounded CPU, memory, storage, process count and wall time.",
        "change_trigger": "Isolated execution sandbox: review on tool arguments, permissions, sandbox, network destinations or retry semantics change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-SANDBOX",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Sandbox profile and base-image digest",
          "Escape and resource-limit test report",
          "Teardown and residue check"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Isolated execution sandbox",
        "owner_role": "Runtime security engineer",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A tool action exceeds its authorized scope or creates duplicate external effects.",
        "rollback": "Disable the affected write or execution capability. Restore a compatible restricted route after replay checks; separately assess compensation for completed external effects.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-SANDBOX",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C06\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Sandbox profile and base-image digest\", \"Escape and resource-limit test report\", \"Teardown and residue check\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-SANDBOX\", \"implementation\": \"Run code in an ephemeral least-privilege sandbox with no inherited credentials, read-only base image, bounded CPU, memory, storage, process count and wall time.\", \"layerId\": \"tool-execution\", \"name\": \"Isolated execution sandbox\", \"objective\": \"Constrain generated code and commands to explicit filesystem, process, resource and lifetime boundaries.\", \"order\": 2, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S08\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.3.1\", \"C10.1.3\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Runtime security engineer\", \"verification\": \"Exercise filesystem escape, process spawning, secret discovery, resource exhaustion and timeout cases; confirm containment and reliable teardown.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Exercise filesystem escape, process spawning, secret discovery, resource exhaustion and timeout cases; confirm containment and reliable teardown.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Block direct network access and broker approved destinations, protocols and methods through an allowlist with DNS and redirect controls, payload limits and destination logging.",
        "change_trigger": "Deny-by-default egress broker: review on tool arguments, permissions, sandbox, network destinations or retry semantics change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-EGRESS",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Egress allowlist with business purpose",
          "Egress bypass test results",
          "Destination and volume log sample"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Deny-by-default egress broker",
        "owner_role": "Cloud network security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A tool action exceeds its authorized scope or creates duplicate external effects.",
        "rollback": "Disable the affected write or execution capability. Restore a compatible restricted route after replay checks; separately assess compensation for completed external effects.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-EGRESS",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C07\", \"C16\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Egress allowlist with business purpose\", \"Egress bypass test results\", \"Destination and volume log sample\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\", \"contain\"], \"id\": \"CTL-EGRESS\", \"implementation\": \"Block direct network access and broker approved destinations, protocols and methods through an allowlist with DNS and redirect controls, payload limits and destination logging.\", \"layerId\": \"tool-execution\", \"name\": \"Deny-by-default egress broker\", \"objective\": \"Restrict agent-controlled network traffic to necessary, observable destinations and methods.\", \"order\": 3, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S10\", \"S11\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.3.7\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Cloud network security owner\", \"verification\": \"Attempt direct IP, alternate DNS, redirect, proxy and unlisted destination paths from agent execution; confirm denial and attributable telemetry.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Attempt direct IP, alternate DNS, redirect, proxy and unlisted destination paths from agent execution; confirm denial and attributable telemetry.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Attach an idempotency key to each logical action, reject replay, prefer staged commits and define compensating or rollback operations before enabling high-impact tools.",
        "change_trigger": "Idempotency and reversible action design: review on tool arguments, permissions, sandbox, network destinations or retry semantics change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-IDEMPOTENCY",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Idempotency-key contract",
          "Replay and partial-failure test report",
          "Compensating-action runbook"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Idempotency and reversible action design",
        "owner_role": "Workflow service owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "A tool action exceeds its authorized scope or creates duplicate external effects.",
        "rollback": "Disable the affected write or execution capability. Restore a compatible restricted route after replay checks; separately assess compensation for completed external effects.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-IDEMPOTENCY",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C05\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Idempotency-key contract\", \"Replay and partial-failure test report\", \"Compensating-action runbook\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-IDEMPOTENCY\", \"implementation\": \"Attach an idempotency key to each logical action, reject replay, prefer staged commits and define compensating or rollback operations before enabling high-impact tools.\", \"layerId\": \"tool-execution\", \"name\": \"Idempotency and reversible action design\", \"objective\": \"Prevent retries or duplicated decisions from multiplying external side effects and preserve a recovery path.\", \"order\": 4, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.2.3\", \"C9.2.4\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Workflow service owner\", \"verification\": \"Repeat, delay and reorder identical action requests and simulate partial failure; confirm a single committed effect and a tested recovery path.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Repeat, delay and reorder identical action requests and simulate partial failure; confirm a single committed effect and a tested recovery path.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Enforce separate namespaces, authorize every read and write, carry tenant and subject provenance and deny cross-purpose retrieval by default.",
        "change_trigger": "Authorized memory namespace: review on memory namespace, writer policy, retention, provenance or retrieval behavior changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-MEMORY-AUTH",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Memory authorization matrix",
          "Namespace isolation test report",
          "Denied-access audit samples"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Authorized memory namespace",
        "owner_role": "Data platform owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Unauthorized or stale memory affects a later decision.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine affected entries and restore an authorized compatible memory snapshot; preserve the audit trail and do not restore deleted or revoked data.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-MEMORY-AUTH",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C08\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Memory authorization matrix\", \"Namespace isolation test report\", \"Denied-access audit samples\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-MEMORY-AUTH\", \"implementation\": \"Enforce separate namespaces, authorize every read and write, carry tenant and subject provenance and deny cross-purpose retrieval by default.\", \"layerId\": \"memory-integrity\", \"name\": \"Authorized memory namespace\", \"objective\": \"Bind memory reads and writes to the current identity, tenant, purpose and retention class.\", \"order\": 1, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C8.1.3\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Data platform owner\", \"verification\": \"Attempt memory reads and writes across users, tenants, roles and purposes; confirm denial and an attributable audit record.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Attempt memory reads and writes across users, tenants, roles and purposes; confirm denial and an attributable audit record.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Validate memory schemas, retain source and writer identity, classify trust, detect conflicting high-impact facts and quarantine suspicious writes before retrieval.",
        "change_trigger": "Memory write validation and provenance: review on memory namespace, writer policy, retention, provenance or retrieval behavior changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-MEMORY-VALIDATION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Memory schema and trust policy",
          "Poisoning test corpus results",
          "Quarantine queue sample"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Memory write validation and provenance",
        "owner_role": "AI data security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Unauthorized or stale memory affects a later decision.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine affected entries and restore an authorized compatible memory snapshot; preserve the audit trail and do not restore deleted or revoked data.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-MEMORY-VALIDATION",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C08\", \"C09\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Memory schema and trust policy\", \"Poisoning test corpus results\", \"Quarantine queue sample\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\", \"contain\"], \"id\": \"CTL-MEMORY-VALIDATION\", \"implementation\": \"Validate memory schemas, retain source and writer identity, classify trust, detect conflicting high-impact facts and quarantine suspicious writes before retrieval.\", \"layerId\": \"memory-integrity\", \"name\": \"Memory write validation and provenance\", \"objective\": \"Keep untrusted, contradictory or malformed content from silently becoming persistent decision context.\", \"order\": 2, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C8.2.1\", \"C8.2.3\", \"C8.2.4\", \"C8.2.5\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"AI data security owner\", \"verification\": \"Submit malformed, untrusted, contradictory and cross-scope memories; confirm rejection or quarantine and retained provenance.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Submit malformed, untrusted, contradictory and cross-scope memories; confirm rejection or quarantine and retained provenance.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Version writes, apply explicit TTL and deletion rules, preserve source metadata and record which memory versions influenced each material decision.",
        "change_trigger": "Versioned memory lifecycle: review on memory namespace, writer policy, retention, provenance or retrieval behavior changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-MEMORY-LIFECYCLE",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Retention and deletion schedule",
          "Memory version history sample",
          "Expiry and deletion test results"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Versioned memory lifecycle",
        "owner_role": "Data governance owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Unauthorized or stale memory affects a later decision.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine affected entries and restore an authorized compatible memory snapshot; preserve the audit trail and do not restore deleted or revoked data.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-MEMORY-LIFECYCLE",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C08\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Retention and deletion schedule\", \"Memory version history sample\", \"Expiry and deletion test results\"], \"functions\": [\"detect\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-MEMORY-LIFECYCLE\", \"implementation\": \"Version writes, apply explicit TTL and deletion rules, preserve source metadata and record which memory versions influenced each material decision.\", \"layerId\": \"memory-integrity\", \"name\": \"Versioned memory lifecycle\", \"objective\": \"Make persistent agent state inspectable, expirable and attributable over time.\", \"order\": 3, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": false, \"sourceIds\": [\"S01\", \"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C8.3.1\", \"C8.3.2\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Data governance owner\", \"verification\": \"Advance expiry, delete a subject and replay a decision trace; confirm expired data is unavailable and the influencing memory versions remain identifiable.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Advance expiry, delete a subject and replay a decision trace; confirm expired data is unavailable and the influencing memory versions remain identifiable.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Detect anomalous write or retrieval patterns, isolate affected namespaces, block further influence and support operator-approved rollback with preserved audit evidence.",
        "change_trigger": "Memory quarantine and rollback: review on memory namespace, writer policy, retention, provenance or retrieval behavior changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-MEMORY-ROLLBACK",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Memory anomaly rules",
          "Quarantine and rollback exercise report",
          "Preserved incident evidence index"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Memory quarantine and rollback",
        "owner_role": "Security operations owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "Unauthorized or stale memory affects a later decision.",
        "rollback": "Quarantine affected entries and restore an authorized compatible memory snapshot; preserve the audit trail and do not restore deleted or revoked data.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-MEMORY-ROLLBACK",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C09\", \"C14\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Memory anomaly rules\", \"Quarantine and rollback exercise report\", \"Preserved incident evidence index\"], \"functions\": [\"detect\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-MEMORY-ROLLBACK\", \"implementation\": \"Detect anomalous write or retrieval patterns, isolate affected namespaces, block further influence and support operator-approved rollback with preserved audit evidence.\", \"layerId\": \"memory-integrity\", \"name\": \"Memory quarantine and rollback\", \"objective\": \"Remove suspected poisoned state and restore a known version without destroying investigation evidence.\", \"order\": 4, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": false, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C8.2.4\", \"C8.3.2\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Security operations owner\", \"verification\": \"Seed a known poisoned record, trigger detection, quarantine the namespace and restore the prior version; confirm downstream retrieval no longer returns the record.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Seed a known poisoned record, trigger detection, quarantine the namespace and restore the prior version; confirm downstream retrieval no longer returns the record.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Maintain a versioned allowlist of component identity, source, version, digest, permissions and owner; reject undeclared capabilities at build and connection time.",
        "change_trigger": "Component and capability allowlist: review on component identity, digest, provenance, dependency graph, owner or admission policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-COMPONENT-ALLOWLIST",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Approved component and capability registry",
          "Admission-policy test results",
          "Exception record with expiry when applicable"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Component and capability allowlist",
        "owner_role": "Product security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unapproved component or capability enters the runtime.",
        "rollback": "Block the suspect component and restore a reviewed compatible dependency set; verify signatures, access scope and current revocation status before reuse.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-COMPONENT-ALLOWLIST",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C10\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Approved component and capability registry\", \"Admission-policy test results\", \"Exception record with expiry when applicable\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-COMPONENT-ALLOWLIST\", \"implementation\": \"Maintain a versioned allowlist of component identity, source, version, digest, permissions and owner; reject undeclared capabilities at build and connection time.\", \"layerId\": \"supply-chain\", \"name\": \"Component and capability allowlist\", \"objective\": \"Prevent unreviewed packages, tools, skills, models and servers from entering the agent path.\", \"order\": 1, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S07\", \"S08\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C6.1.1\", \"C6.1.2\", \"C6.1.3\", \"C6.1.4\", \"C10.1.1\", \"C10.1.2\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Product security owner\", \"verification\": \"Introduce an unlisted package, tool, skill and MCP server in a release candidate; confirm each is blocked before use.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Introduce an unlisted package, tool, skill and MCP server in a release candidate; confirm each is blocked before use.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Pin immutable digests, verify signed provenance against declared build expectations and trusted roots and fail closed on mismatch or missing evidence.",
        "change_trigger": "Digest and provenance verification: review on component identity, digest, provenance, dependency graph, owner or admission policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-INTEGRITY-PROVENANCE",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Pinned artifact digest set",
          "Verified provenance statement",
          "Trusted-root and build-expectation policy"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Digest and provenance verification",
        "owner_role": "Software supply-chain security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unapproved component or capability enters the runtime.",
        "rollback": "Block the suspect component and restore a reviewed compatible dependency set; verify signatures, access scope and current revocation status before reuse.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-INTEGRITY-PROVENANCE",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C10\", \"C11\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Pinned artifact digest set\", \"Verified provenance statement\", \"Trusted-root and build-expectation policy\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-INTEGRITY-PROVENANCE\", \"implementation\": \"Pin immutable digests, verify signed provenance against declared build expectations and trusted roots and fail closed on mismatch or missing evidence.\", \"layerId\": \"supply-chain\", \"name\": \"Digest and provenance verification\", \"objective\": \"Verify that the admitted artifact is the expected output from an identified build and trusted source.\", \"order\": 2, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S07\", \"S08\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C6.1.2\", \"C6.1.3\", \"C6.1.4\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Software supply-chain security owner\", \"verification\": \"Substitute the artifact, builder identity, source reference and signature root independently; confirm admission fails for every mismatch.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Substitute the artifact, builder identity, source reference and signature root independently; confirm admission fails for every mismatch.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Generate a release-bound inventory with component version, digest, source, license, owner, privileges and transitive dependencies; retain it with the release record.",
        "change_trigger": "AI bill of materials and ownership: review on component identity, digest, provenance, dependency graph, owner or admission policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-AIBOM",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Release-bound SBOM or AIBOM",
          "Runtime-to-inventory reconciliation report",
          "Named component owners"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "AI bill of materials and ownership",
        "owner_role": "Release engineering owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unapproved component or capability enters the runtime.",
        "rollback": "Block the suspect component and restore a reviewed compatible dependency set; verify signatures, access scope and current revocation status before reuse.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-AIBOM",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C10\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Release-bound SBOM or AIBOM\", \"Runtime-to-inventory reconciliation report\", \"Named component owners\"], \"functions\": [\"detect\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-AIBOM\", \"implementation\": \"Generate a release-bound inventory with component version, digest, source, license, owner, privileges and transitive dependencies; retain it with the release record.\", \"layerId\": \"supply-chain\", \"name\": \"AI bill of materials and ownership\", \"objective\": \"Keep an actionable inventory of the models, data-dependent services, tools and software that form each release.\", \"order\": 3, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": false, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S07\", \"S08\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C6.2.1\", \"C6.2.2\", \"C6.2.3\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Release engineering owner\", \"verification\": \"Select a deployed release and reconcile its runtime components against the retained inventory; investigate every missing or unexpected item.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Select a deployed release and reconcile its runtime components against the retained inventory; investigate every missing or unexpected item.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Scan dependencies, review material version or permission changes, require policy-based admission and maintain a tested path to quarantine, revoke and rebuild affected releases.",
        "change_trigger": "Dependency admission and revocation: review on component identity, digest, provenance, dependency graph, owner or admission policy changes.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-DEPENDENCY-ADMISSION",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Dependency change review",
          "Admission scan results",
          "Component revocation exercise"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Dependency admission and revocation",
        "owner_role": "Application security owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unapproved component or capability enters the runtime.",
        "rollback": "Block the suspect component and restore a reviewed compatible dependency set; verify signatures, access scope and current revocation status before reuse.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-DEPENDENCY-ADMISSION",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C10\", \"C11\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Dependency change review\", \"Admission scan results\", \"Component revocation exercise\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-DEPENDENCY-ADMISSION\", \"implementation\": \"Scan dependencies, review material version or permission changes, require policy-based admission and maintain a tested path to quarantine, revoke and rebuild affected releases.\", \"layerId\": \"supply-chain\", \"name\": \"Dependency admission and revocation\", \"objective\": \"Detect risky component changes before release and remove affected versions quickly after new evidence.\", \"order\": 4, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S07\", \"S08\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C6.1.1\", \"C6.1.2\", \"C6.1.3\", \"C6.1.4\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Application security owner\", \"verification\": \"Simulate a newly disallowed component version and confirm build admission stops, deployed inventory is found and the rebuild or rollback procedure succeeds.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Simulate a newly disallowed component version and confirm build admission stops, deployed inventory is found and the rebuild or rollback procedure succeeds.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Emit structured, access-controlled records for correlation ID, workload and user identity, tenant, input trust class, policy version and decision, tool arguments, result and approval reference.",
        "change_trigger": "End-to-end action audit trail: review on logging, limits, approval scope, escalation routes or containment mechanisms change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-AUDIT",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Structured audit event schema",
          "Sample reconstructed action trace",
          "Log access and retention policy"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "End-to-end action audit trail",
        "owner_role": "Observability platform owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unsafe action continues without a usable audit, approval or containment path.",
        "rollback": "Stop the affected action route, preserve available evidence and use a read-only or human-mediated fallback until the audit and containment path is exercised.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-AUDIT",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C12\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Structured audit event schema\", \"Sample reconstructed action trace\", \"Log access and retention policy\"], \"functions\": [\"detect\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-AUDIT\", \"implementation\": \"Emit structured, access-controlled records for correlation ID, workload and user identity, tenant, input trust class, policy version and decision, tool arguments, result and approval reference.\", \"layerId\": \"monitoring-oversight\", \"name\": \"End-to-end action audit trail\", \"objective\": \"Reconstruct which identity, input, policy, model decision, tool and result produced a material side effect.\", \"order\": 1, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S06\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C12.1.1\", \"C12.1.3\", \"C12.4.2\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Observability platform owner\", \"verification\": \"Choose a material test action and reconstruct its complete chain from ingress to result without relying on model prose or mutable application state.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Choose a material test action and reconstruct its complete chain from ingress to result without relying on model prose or mutable application state.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Set enforceable per-task and per-identity limits for requests, tokens, iterations, tool calls, elapsed time and spend; terminate rather than merely alert at a hard boundary.",
        "change_trigger": "Hard action, iteration and spend limits: review on logging, limits, approval scope, escalation routes or containment mechanisms change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-RATE-SPEND",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Versioned limit policy",
          "Boundary and concurrency test results",
          "Stop-decision telemetry"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Hard action, iteration and spend limits",
        "owner_role": "AI platform operations owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unsafe action continues without a usable audit, approval or containment path.",
        "rollback": "Stop the affected action route, preserve available evidence and use a read-only or human-mediated fallback until the audit and containment path is exercised.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-RATE-SPEND",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C13\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Versioned limit policy\", \"Boundary and concurrency test results\", \"Stop-decision telemetry\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\", \"contain\"], \"id\": \"CTL-RATE-SPEND\", \"implementation\": \"Set enforceable per-task and per-identity limits for requests, tokens, iterations, tool calls, elapsed time and spend; terminate rather than merely alert at a hard boundary.\", \"layerId\": \"monitoring-oversight\", \"name\": \"Hard action, iteration and spend limits\", \"objective\": \"Stop autonomous execution before it exceeds the approved operational envelope.\", \"order\": 2, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.1.1\", \"C9.1.2\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"AI platform operations owner\", \"verification\": \"Drive each meter to its configured boundary independently and confirm no further model or tool action occurs after the stop decision.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Drive each meter to its configured boundary independently and confirm no further model or tool action occurs after the stop decision.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Pause before side effects, show complete operation parameters and impact, bind approver identity and nonce to the unchanged request and expire or invalidate approval after modification.",
        "change_trigger": "Bound human approval for high-impact action: review on logging, limits, approval scope, escalation routes or containment mechanisms change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-HUMAN-APPROVAL",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "High-impact action classification",
          "Approval binding specification",
          "Mutation and replay test report"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Bound human approval for high-impact action",
        "owner_role": "Business risk owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unsafe action continues without a usable audit, approval or containment path.",
        "rollback": "Stop the affected action route, preserve available evidence and use a read-only or human-mediated fallback until the audit and containment path is exercised.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-HUMAN-APPROVAL",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C05\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"High-impact action classification\", \"Approval binding specification\", \"Mutation and replay test report\"], \"functions\": [\"prevent\", \"detect\"], \"id\": \"CTL-HUMAN-APPROVAL\", \"implementation\": \"Pause before side effects, show complete operation parameters and impact, bind approver identity and nonce to the unchanged request and expire or invalidate approval after modification.\", \"layerId\": \"monitoring-oversight\", \"name\": \"Bound human approval for high-impact action\", \"objective\": \"Require accountable human authorization for the exact irreversible or high-impact operation.\", \"order\": 3, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.2.1\", \"C9.2.8\", \"C9.2.9\", \"C9.2.10\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Business risk owner\", \"verification\": \"Change parameters, identity, context and timing after approval; confirm every mutation requires a new approval and the original cannot be replayed.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Change parameters, identity, context and timing after approval; confirm every mutation requires a new approval and the original cannot be replayed.",
        "verified_at": null
      },
      {
        "action": "Provide an independent operator path to trip circuit breakers, revoke credentials, block tool and egress access, quarantine memory or workloads and retain audit evidence.",
        "change_trigger": "Out-of-band containment and kill procedure: review on logging, limits, approval scope, escalation routes or containment mechanisms change.",
        "config": "security",
        "control_id": "CTL-KILL-SWITCH",
        "decision_job": "RELEASE_EVIDENCE",
        "evidence_type": [
          "Out-of-band kill runbook",
          "Credential and capability revocation test",
          "Containment exercise timeline"
        ],
        "field_origin": "action/verification/evidence/owner: source; risk/boundary/trigger/rollback: engineering proposal",
        "limitations": [
          "Engineering draft; independent human review is pending.",
          "A listed artifact or suggested role does not establish operating effectiveness or an actual assignment.",
          "New normalized fields require canonical upstream adoption before public release."
        ],
        "name": "Out-of-band containment and kill procedure",
        "owner_role": "Incident response owner",
        "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
        "risk": "An unsafe action continues without a usable audit, approval or containment path.",
        "rollback": "Stop the affected action route, preserve available evidence and use a read-only or human-mediated fallback until the audit and containment path is exercised.",
        "snapshot_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
        "source_commit_sha": "a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee",
        "source_data_hash": "sha256:a50333997f3f9832df16329f27d8e5be608c50ba1dffea0282ee1b1eff0956a6",
        "source_native_id": "CTL-KILL-SWITCH",
        "source_payload_json": "{\"claimIds\": [\"C14\", \"C20\"], \"evidenceArtifacts\": [\"Out-of-band kill runbook\", \"Credential and capability revocation test\", \"Containment exercise timeline\"], \"functions\": [\"detect\", \"contain\", \"recover\"], \"id\": \"CTL-KILL-SWITCH\", \"implementation\": \"Provide an independent operator path to trip circuit breakers, revoke credentials, block tool and egress access, quarantine memory or workloads and retain audit evidence.\", \"layerId\": \"monitoring-oversight\", \"name\": \"Out-of-band containment and kill procedure\", \"objective\": \"Stop an unsafe action chain even when the agent, model or primary application path is unavailable or compromised.\", \"order\": 4, \"releaseGateWhenRequired\": true, \"sourceIds\": [\"S03\", \"S04\", \"S12\"], \"standardRefs\": [\"C9.1.3\", \"C9.6.1\", \"C9.6.2\", \"C9.6.3\", \"C12.4.3\"], \"suggestedOwnerRole\": \"Incident response owner\", \"verification\": \"Run a timed exercise with the agent control plane unavailable; confirm operators can stop calls, revoke authority, isolate affected state and preserve evidence.\"}",
        "source_url": "https://github.com/PharosProduction/agent-security-control-mapper/blob/a35b9c30594162eadf4d790d33bd18aaa785bcee/data/controls.json",
        "status": "DRAFT",
        "system_boundary": "Agent runtime, delegated identities and connected tools in the selected environment.",
        "verification": "Run a timed exercise with the agent control plane unavailable; confirm operators can stop calls, revoke authority, isolate affected state and preserve evidence.",
        "verified_at": null
      }
    ]
  },
  "generated_at": "2026-09-17T06:17:24Z",
  "mode": "DRAFT_EXPLORATION",
  "publish_eligible": false,
  "release_version": "0.1.0-candidate.1",
  "review_status": "NOT_REVIEWED",
  "schema_version": "2.0.0-candidate.1"
}