callensxavier commited on
Commit
afe6102
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): a045e0a

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +99 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ tags:
4
+ - attention
5
+ - positional-encoding
6
+ - benchmark
7
+ - negative-result
8
+ - calabi-yau
9
+ - number-theory
10
+ pretty_name: CY-Sieve Attention — GPU Quality/Perf Benchmark (NVIDIA L4)
11
+ configs:
12
+ - config_name: quality_perplexity
13
+ data_files: quality_perplexity.csv
14
+ - config_name: perf_hbm
15
+ data_files: perf_hbm.csv
16
+ ---
17
+
18
+ # CY-Sieve Attention — GPU benchmark results (NVIDIA L4, 2026-06-22)
19
+
20
+ Benchmark artifacts for the **CY-Sieve positional-attention kernel**, a falsifiable
21
+ engineering experiment from the [Mirror-Map-Sieve](https://github.com/xaviercallens/Mirror-Map-Sieve)
22
+ project. The bias derives from the weight-5 Apéry-like sequence
23
+ $S_{20}(n)=\sum_k \binom{n}{k}^4\binom{n+k}{k}$ (a Calabi–Yau **3-fold** period;
24
+ the geometry fixes the long-range decay slope $\log\lambda=3.762$ and curvature
25
+ $\beta=2$).
26
+
27
+ ## ⚠️ Headline: this is a documented NEGATIVE result
28
+
29
+ On real WikiText-2, trained from scratch, the positional scheme **failed its
30
+ quality gate (KILL, +10.15%)** — a plain sliding window beat every CY-Sieve
31
+ variant. The kernel is numerically correct and has a real memory advantage, but a
32
+ fast kernel that hurts model quality is a failed kernel. We publish the negative
33
+ result deliberately; it is the science working as intended.
34
+
35
+ ## Files
36
+
37
+ | file | contents |
38
+ |---|---|
39
+ | `quality_perplexity.csv` | §5 quality gate — val perplexity per positional scheme × context (the decisive result) |
40
+ | `perf_hbm.csv` | §6 — kernel latency + bias-path HBM bytes per sequence length |
41
+ | `run3_20260622_l4_quality.json` | raw §5 output (corpus, config, verdict) |
42
+ | `run3_20260622_l4_perf.json` | raw §6 output |
43
+ | `run3_20260622_l4_gpu_phase.json` | orchestrator summary (§4/§5/§6 headline) |
44
+ | `run3_20260622_l4.log` | full run log |
45
+ | `PHASE3_CYSIEVE_GPU_FINDINGS.md` | the complete findings writeup + redesign directions |
46
+
47
+ ## §5 — Quality gate (the decisive result)
48
+
49
+ Methodology: train small GPTs **from scratch**, identical arch/data/compute, one
50
+ per positional scheme, on real WikiText-2 (`Salesforce/wikitext`), byte-level.
51
+ (Zero-shot-swapping the scheme on a *frozen* model was tried and rejected as
52
+ invalid — it collapses every scheme equally.) Validation perplexity:
53
+
54
+ | scheme | @512 (train) | @1024 (2×) | @2048 (4×) |
55
+ |---|---|---|---|
56
+ | **learned-absolute** | **4.22** | 12.10 | 20.82 |
57
+ | ALiBi | 10.74 | 11.73 | 11.35 |
58
+ | **sliding-window** | **4.99** | **5.07** | **5.03** |
59
+ | CY-Sieve τ-ladder | 11.33 | 12.31 | 12.05 |
60
+ | CY-Sieve τ=20 | 16.02 | 16.81 | 16.49 |
61
+ | CY-Sieve τ=128 | 6.80 | 7.12 | 7.00 |
62
+ | CY-Sieve τ=512 | 4.65 | 6.08 | 10.62 |
63
+
64
+ **Verdict: KILL.** Best baseline 4.22 (learned-absolute); best CY-Sieve 4.65
65
+ (τ=512) → **+10.15%**, past the >5% kill threshold. The geometry-fixed slope is too
66
+ steep for a drop-in scheme: no single τ balances absolute quality against
67
+ extrapolation, and the τ-ladder lands at ~11–12.
68
+
69
+ ## §6 — Performance + memory (NVIDIA L4, D=64, fp16, causal)
70
+
71
+ | L | CY-Sieve (ms) | dense SDPA (ms) | bias-HBM reduction |
72
+ |---|---|---|---|
73
+ | 4096 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 2048× |
74
+ | 8192 | 1.08 | 0.29 | 4096× |
75
+ | 16384 | 4.16 | 1.02 | **8192×** |
76
+ | 32768 | 15.28 | 2.51 | 16384× |
77
+
78
+ The bias-path HBM claim is **confirmed** — O(L) bytes (recurrence-generated) vs
79
+ O(L²) for a materialized table. But the unfused kernel is **~4–6× slower** than
80
+ fused dense SDPA: a memory-traffic win, **not** a latency win. Per the project's
81
+ honesty rule, with §5 failing these numbers are *not* presented as a contribution.
82
+
83
+ ## Hardware / reproducibility
84
+
85
+ NVIDIA L4 (24 GB), PyTorch 2.9.1+cu129, Triton 3.5.1. §4 Triton↔reference parity:
86
+ PASS (4/4). Full method: `PHASE3_CYSIEVE_GPU_FINDINGS.md` and
87
+ [the repo](https://github.com/xaviercallens/Mirror-Map-Sieve).
88
+
89
+ ## Citation
90
+
91
+ ```bibtex
92
+ @misc{callens2026cysieve,
93
+ author = {Callens, Xavier},
94
+ title = {CY-Sieve Attention: a Calabi--Yau positional bias and its negative quality result},
95
+ year = {2026},
96
+ url = {https://github.com/xaviercallens/Mirror-Map-Sieve},
97
+ doi = {10.5281/zenodo.20747943}
98
+ }
99
+ ```