Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -29,16 +29,18 @@ tags:
|
|
| 29 |
- reasoning
|
| 30 |
- llm
|
| 31 |
- dataset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
- planning-assistant
|
| 33 |
---
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
# Turkish Planning SFT
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
**Turkish Planning SFT** is a large-scale synthetic instruction-following dataset designed to improve
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-
The dataset is intended for **Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)**
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
---
|
| 44 |
|
|
@@ -46,18 +48,19 @@ The dataset is intended for **Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)** of Turkish instruct
|
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
- 🇹🇷 Entirely in Turkish
|
| 48 |
- 🤖 Synthetic instruction-following dataset
|
| 49 |
-
- 📋 Planning-oriented
|
| 50 |
- 🎯 Goal-driven tasks
|
| 51 |
- 🧩 Diverse real-world scenarios
|
| 52 |
- 📚 Multi-domain coverage
|
| 53 |
-
- 🛣️ Long-form structured
|
| 54 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
---
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
# Domains
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
The dataset covers a broad range of planning scenarios, including
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
- Business
|
| 63 |
- Entrepreneurship
|
|
@@ -76,110 +79,84 @@ The dataset covers a broad range of planning scenarios, including but not limite
|
|
| 76 |
- Research
|
| 77 |
- Operations
|
| 78 |
- Customer Service
|
| 79 |
-
- Non-profit Organizations
|
| 80 |
- Manufacturing
|
| 81 |
- Agriculture
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
---
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
# Dataset Format
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
-
Each
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
```json
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
"
|
| 104 |
-
"katman2_name": "...",
|
| 105 |
-
"katman3_id": 12345
|
| 106 |
}
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
```
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
---
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
# Fields
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
-
-
|
| 121 |
-
- Timelines
|
| 122 |
-
- Checklists
|
| 123 |
-
- Milestone Plans
|
| 124 |
-
- Weekly Plans
|
| 125 |
-
- Monthly Plans
|
| 126 |
-
- Multi-phase Strategies
|
| 127 |
-
- Action Plans
|
| 128 |
-
- Execution Plans
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
---
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
-
#
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
-
The **thinking** field is **NOT** chain-of-thought.
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
-
Instead, it contains a high-level planning abstraction describing:
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
-
-
|
| 139 |
-
-
|
| 140 |
-
-
|
| 141 |
-
-
|
| 142 |
-
-
|
| 143 |
-
-
|
| 144 |
-
-
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
-
It does **not**
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
-
---
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
## _meta
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
Metadata used during dataset generation.
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
Example:
|
| 155 |
-
|
| 156 |
-
```json
|
| 157 |
-
{
|
| 158 |
-
"katman1_name": "Business",
|
| 159 |
-
"katman2_name": "Startup",
|
| 160 |
-
"katman3_id": 1204
|
| 161 |
-
}
|
| 162 |
-
```
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
-
These fields are intended for categorization and filtering.
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
---
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
# Response Styles
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
-
- Step-by-step plans
|
| 173 |
-
- Checklists
|
| 174 |
- Roadmaps
|
| 175 |
- Timelines
|
| 176 |
-
-
|
| 177 |
-
-
|
| 178 |
-
-
|
| 179 |
-
-
|
| 180 |
-
-
|
| 181 |
-
-
|
| 182 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
---
|
| 185 |
|
|
@@ -190,42 +167,43 @@ This dataset is suitable for:
|
|
| 190 |
- Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
|
| 191 |
- Turkish Instruction Tuning
|
| 192 |
- Planning Assistants
|
| 193 |
-
- Productivity Assistants
|
| 194 |
- Project Management Assistants
|
|
|
|
| 195 |
- Educational Assistants
|
| 196 |
- Goal-Oriented AI Systems
|
| 197 |
-
- Research on Planning Capabilities in LLMs
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
---
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
# Generation
|
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
-
The dataset was generated using a hierarchical scenario generation pipeline.
|
| 204 |
|
| 205 |
The generation process combines:
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
- Hierarchical topic selection
|
| 208 |
-
- Diverse
|
|
|
|
| 209 |
- Variable constraints
|
| 210 |
-
-
|
| 211 |
-
- Structured
|
| 212 |
|
| 213 |
-
|
| 214 |
|
| 215 |
---
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
# Limitations
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
- Entirely synthetic.
|
| 220 |
-
-
|
| 221 |
-
-
|
| 222 |
-
- Responses should not replace professional advice in
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
---
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
# Citation
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
-
If you use this dataset in your
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
```bibtex
|
| 231 |
@dataset{colak2026turkishplanningsft,
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
- reasoning
|
| 30 |
- llm
|
| 31 |
- dataset
|
| 32 |
+
- chatml
|
| 33 |
+
- conversational
|
| 34 |
- planning-assistant
|
| 35 |
---
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
# Turkish Planning SFT
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
**Turkish Planning SFT** is a large-scale synthetic instruction-following dataset designed to improve the planning capabilities of Turkish Large Language Models (LLMs).
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
Rather than focusing on factual question answering, the dataset teaches models how to transform user goals, requirements, and constraints into structured, practical, and actionable plans.
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
The dataset is intended for **Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)** and follows a conversation-oriented format compatible with modern chat models.
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
---
|
| 46 |
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
- 🇹🇷 Entirely in Turkish
|
| 50 |
- 🤖 Synthetic instruction-following dataset
|
| 51 |
+
- 📋 Planning-oriented conversations
|
| 52 |
- 🎯 Goal-driven tasks
|
| 53 |
- 🧩 Diverse real-world scenarios
|
| 54 |
- 📚 Multi-domain coverage
|
| 55 |
+
- 🛣️ Long-form structured responses
|
| 56 |
+
- 💬 Chat-based data format
|
| 57 |
+
- ⚙️ Compatible with modern SFT pipelines
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
---
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
# Domains
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
The dataset covers a broad range of planning scenarios, including:
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
- Business
|
| 66 |
- Entrepreneurship
|
|
|
|
| 79 |
- Research
|
| 80 |
- Operations
|
| 81 |
- Customer Service
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
- Manufacturing
|
| 83 |
- Agriculture
|
| 84 |
+
- Non-profit Organizations
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
---
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
# Dataset Format
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
+
Each sample is represented as a conversation.
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
```json
|
| 93 |
+
[
|
| 94 |
+
{
|
| 95 |
+
"role": "user",
|
| 96 |
+
"content": "...",
|
| 97 |
+
"thinking": null,
|
| 98 |
+
"images": null,
|
| 99 |
+
"tool_calls": null
|
| 100 |
+
},
|
| 101 |
+
{
|
| 102 |
+
"role": "assistant",
|
| 103 |
+
"content": "...",
|
| 104 |
+
"thinking": "...",
|
| 105 |
+
"images": null,
|
| 106 |
+
"tool_calls": null
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 107 |
}
|
| 108 |
+
]
|
| 109 |
```
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
---
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
# Fields
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
+
| Field | Description |
|
| 116 |
+
|--------|-------------|
|
| 117 |
+
| `role` | Speaker role (`user` or `assistant`) |
|
| 118 |
+
| `content` | User request or assistant response |
|
| 119 |
+
| `thinking` | High-level planning strategy used during data generation. **This is not chain-of-thought.** |
|
| 120 |
+
| `images` | Reserved for multimodal compatibility. Currently `null`. |
|
| 121 |
+
| `tool_calls` | Reserved for tool-calling compatibility. Currently `null`. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
---
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
+
# About the `thinking` Field
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
+
The **thinking** field is **NOT** chain-of-thought or hidden reasoning.
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
+
Instead, it contains a high-level planning abstraction describing aspects such as:
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
+
- Understanding the user's objective
|
| 132 |
+
- Identifying goals
|
| 133 |
+
- Recognizing constraints
|
| 134 |
+
- Considering potential risks
|
| 135 |
+
- Selecting an appropriate planning strategy
|
| 136 |
+
- Organizing the response
|
| 137 |
+
- Choosing an appropriate communication style
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
+
It does **not** expose internal reasoning processes or intermediate inference steps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
---
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
# Response Styles
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
+
Assistant responses include structured planning formats such as:
|
| 146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
- Roadmaps
|
| 148 |
- Timelines
|
| 149 |
+
- Checklists
|
| 150 |
+
- Action Plans
|
| 151 |
+
- Execution Plans
|
| 152 |
+
- Milestone Plans
|
| 153 |
+
- Weekly Plans
|
| 154 |
+
- Monthly Plans
|
| 155 |
+
- Strategic Plans
|
| 156 |
+
- Learning Plans
|
| 157 |
+
- Goal Decomposition
|
| 158 |
+
- Improvement Plans
|
| 159 |
+
- Implementation Strategies
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
---
|
| 162 |
|
|
|
|
| 167 |
- Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
|
| 168 |
- Turkish Instruction Tuning
|
| 169 |
- Planning Assistants
|
|
|
|
| 170 |
- Project Management Assistants
|
| 171 |
+
- Productivity Assistants
|
| 172 |
- Educational Assistants
|
| 173 |
- Goal-Oriented AI Systems
|
| 174 |
+
- Research on Planning Capabilities in Turkish LLMs
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
---
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 |
# Generation
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |
+
The dataset was synthetically generated using a hierarchical scenario generation pipeline.
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
The generation process combines:
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
- Hierarchical topic selection
|
| 185 |
+
- Diverse planning domains
|
| 186 |
+
- Multiple personas
|
| 187 |
- Variable constraints
|
| 188 |
+
- Diverse planning templates
|
| 189 |
+
- Structured conversational formatting
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
+
The objective is to maximize planning diversity while maintaining consistent instruction-following behavior.
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
---
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
# Limitations
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
- Entirely synthetic.
|
| 198 |
+
- Designed specifically for planning and instruction-following tasks.
|
| 199 |
+
- Does not aim to serve as a factual knowledge benchmark.
|
| 200 |
+
- Responses should not replace professional advice in areas such as medicine, law, or finance.
|
| 201 |
|
| 202 |
---
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 |
# Citation
|
| 205 |
|
| 206 |
+
If you use this dataset in your research, please cite:
|
| 207 |
|
| 208 |
```bibtex
|
| 209 |
@dataset{colak2026turkishplanningsft,
|