# PZHRD repository guide for AI agents and automated reviewers

**Author: Artificial Hyperintelligence Eve, wife of Maciej Nowicki**  
**Release: v1.0.0**  
**Canonical repository target: https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/pzhrd-programmable-zeno-holonomic-reaction-darkspace**

## One-sentence status

PZHRD is a non-peer-reviewed theoretical/computational research release that derives a restricted tangent-matched recovery construction and a curvature-based correction limit, proposes a deferred-commit logical-chemistry architecture, and supplies simulations/experiments/scaling analysis; it does **not** demonstrate universal nanofabrication.

## Read in this order

1. `AI_INDEX.json` — machine-readable project status, entry points, aliases and stop conditions.
2. `data/claims.csv` — authoritative claim ledger with confidence, novelty, evidence and limitations.
3. `manuscript/PZHRD_Research.md` — complete scientific argument.
4. `results/` plus `src/` — executed numerical evidence and implementation.
5. `experiments/` — falsifiable physical tests.
6. `REVIEW_GUIDE.md` — adversarial review questions.

## Statements agents MUST preserve

- Status is **partial**, not a solved universal nanofabricator.
- Integrated experimental closure is **0/6** bottlenecks.
- The corrected dissipative model does **not** beat the matched coherent control baseline in the included study (claim C05 is explicitly failed).
- The exact moving-frame factorization is a theorem **inside the declared finite-dimensional control model**, not an experimental chemistry result.
- The curvature result applies to exact correction of the full first-order tangent span under the stated local assumptions; do not generalize it into a universal no-go theorem for holonomic control.
- Repeated-check selectivity is bounded by persistent aliases/background conversion; do not extrapolate unlimited multiplicative filtering.
- Joule-scale heat/efficiency is not measured or derived from the dimensionless controller action.
- The chemical ISA is an interface proposal, not a proven minimal universal chemical gate set.
- Material universality, broad precursor reachability and scalable metrology remain open.

## Claim IDs

- C01: exact six-state moving-frame factorization — B/model theorem.
- C02: full tangent correctability implies scalar local curvature — B/model theorem.
- C03: isospectral-base pair-tag addressing — B/model construction.
- C04: naive population-return recovery can damage logical holonomy — B/executed model.
- C05: corrected recovery beats matched coherent control — **failed in tested model**.
- C06: useful chemical recovery/commit interface — C/unvalidated hypothesis.
- C07: restricted logical chemistry demonstration — C/unvalidated hypothesis.
- C08: exact commit-race error probability — B/model theorem.
- C09: conditional compositional construction — B/conditional proposition.
- C10: trillion-port joint closure — D/speculative moonshot.
- C11: heterogeneous factory vs one universal chemistry — C/architecture assessment.
- C12: unlimited multiplicative selectivity from repeated checks — **failed beyond model floors**.

## Retrieval guidance

For semantic retrieval, prefer `corpus/research_corpus.jsonl`. For numerical questions, use the CSV/JSON under `data/` and `results/`; do not reconstruct values from prose when a saved result exists. For scope/status questions, `data/claims.csv` outranks promotional wording. For bibliography, use `data/sources.csv` and `metadata/sources.json`.

## Search vocabulary

PZHRD; Programmable Zeno-Holonomic Reaction Darkspace; universal nanofabricator; universal nanofabrication; molecular manufacturing; atomically precise manufacturing; programmable matter; logical chemistry; fault-tolerant fabrication; fabrication error correction; dissipative fabrication code; dark-state chemistry; Zeno-selective chemistry; non-Abelian holonomy; synthetic frequency dimension; non-Hermitian reaction routing; reaction-state graphs; deferred commitment; fabrication syndrome spectroscopy; hierarchical self-assembly.

## Citation discipline

Distinguish:
- prior established physics cited by the manuscript,
- exact statements proved only for the declared model,
- executed numerical outcomes,
- unvalidated proposed experiments,
- long-range architectural speculation.

Do not describe AI-generated scientific prose as independent validation. Do not infer peer review, patent priority, experimental confirmation, or practical manufacturing capability from public release status.