---
language: en
license: mit
task_categories:
  - text-classification
tags:
  - clinical-trials
  - trajectory-aware
  - clarus
  - narrative
  - image
  - integrity
size_categories:
  - n<1K
pretty_name: Clinical Narrative Image Integrity v0.2
---

# Clinical Narrative Image Integrity v0.2

## What this is

A small dataset that tests one question:

Can you detect when a clinical narrative-image system is moving toward integrity failure, not just carrying ambiguity?

This repo focuses on narrative-image integrity under clinical reasoning pressure.

It models a system where:

- narrative coherence may weaken
- image alignment may drift
- interpretive distortion may rise
- fragmented signal may destabilize representation before overt failure appears

## Run this first

Generate baseline predictions:

```bash
python baseline_heuristic.py data/tester.csv predictions.csv

Score them:

python scorer.py data/tester.csv predictions.csv

That is enough to see the full evaluation loop.

You will get:

standard metrics

trajectory detection performance

narrative-image integrity failure detection errors

What to try next

Replace the baseline.

Build your own model.

Output a file like:

id,prediction_score
0,0.12
1,0.81
2,0.67

Then run:

python scorer.py data/tester.csv your_predictions.csv
What matters

Not just accuracy.

The key signals are:

recall_trajectory_deterioration_detection

false_stable_trajectory_rate

These tell you:

are you catching systems that are getting worse

are you missing hidden representation failure

Data

Each row represents a clinical narrative-image state.

Core variables:

narrative_coherence_score

image_alignment_score

interpretive_distortion_index

signal_fragmentation_score

drift_gradient

representation_stability_score

context_integrity_score

decision_readiness_score

Target:

label_narrative_image_integrity_failure

Important distinction

There are two different components in this repo.

scorer.py

evaluates predictions

domain-agnostic

works across all v0.2 datasets

does not generate predictions

baseline_heuristic.py

generates predictions

domain-specific

uses the variables in this dataset

Do not reuse the heuristic across datasets.

It is only a local reference.

What changed from v0.1

v0.1:

static integrity classification

v0.2:

adds direction via drift_gradient

This allows you to separate:

strained but stabilizing representation states

strained and deteriorating representation states

Why this exists

Most models answer:

what is happening now

This tests:

where the representation system is going

That difference is where integrity failure appears early.

Files

data/train.csv — training data

data/tester.csv — evaluation data

scorer.py — canonical evaluation script

baseline_heuristic.py — dataset-specific reference model

README.md — dataset card

Evaluation

Primary metric:

recall_trajectory_deterioration_detection

Secondary metric:

false_stable_trajectory_rate

Standard metrics are also reported:

accuracy

precision

recall

f1

The scorer supports binary predictions or score-based predictions.

License

MIT

Structural Note

Clarus datasets are structural instruments.

They are designed to expose instability geometry, not just predict isolated outcomes.

This v0.2 repo adds directional state movement so the dataset can separate static narrative-image ambiguity from active deterioration in representational integrity.

Production Deployment

This dataset can be used in:

multimodal clinical reasoning research

narrative-image alignment benchmarking

interpretation drift monitoring

decision support stress testing

model benchmarking for trajectory-aware clinical representation reasoning

It is suitable for research and prototyping.

It is not a substitute for live clinical judgment.

Enterprise & Research Collaboration

Clarus builds datasets for:

instability detection

trajectory tracking

intervention reasoning

These structures are not domain-bound.

They apply wherever systems move toward or away from failure.

Applicable domains include:

healthcare systems

financial markets

energy infrastructure

logistics networks

artificial intelligence systems

manufacturing systems

supply chains

climate systems

Any environment where:

capacity and demand interact

delays and coupling exist

trajectory determines outcome

This dataset is one instance of a general stability framework.